Urbanization and food transition in the Brazilian Amazon: From wild to domesticated meat

Abstract Urbanization is expected to influence food transitions, resulting in a shift from wild foods to more domesticated foods. Concomitantly, food insecurity and urban demand for natural resources, including wildlife, are expected to increase overall, even when the per capita consumption is expected to decrease. These issues bring challenges to ecosystems and human well‐being. We examined how the degree of urbanization and socioeconomic factors, such as poverty and connections to rural areas, influences the consumption of and preferences for meat from wildlife (mammals, birds and turtles), fish and domesticated animals. We administered 1367 questionnaires to randomly selected households across 10 urban areas in Amazonas state, Brazil. We found that degree of urbanization was associated with a food transition from consuming wildlife and fish to consuming domesticated animals. Taste preference for meat from wildlife and fish decreased with the degree of urbanization. Rural connections were associated with increased consumption of and preference for wild meat (meat from wildlife) and fish. Poverty was associated with increased consumption of fish and processed meat and decreased consumption of beef and pork, with important implications for how food transitions affect households experiencing poverty. These results highlight the spatial, social and economic heterogeneity of consumption and preference. Policy and social interventions, such as campaigns to reduce consumption of vulnerable species or targeted enforcement against poaching, will need to consider this heterogeneity to be effective and avoid unintended consequences, such as worsening food insecurity. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
People and Nature
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10746
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Organic Food and Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urbanization and food transition in the Brazilian Amazon: From wild to domesticated meat

Thaís Q. Morcatty, David S. Wilcove, Eduardo M. von Mühlen, Marcelo Derzi Vidal et al.
4 citations
People and Nature
Organic Food and Agriculture
2.40
article

Urbanization and food transition in the Brazilian Amazon: From wild to domesticated meat

Thaís Q. Morcatty, David S. Wilcove, Eduardo M. von Mühlen, Marcelo Derzi Vidal, Willandia A. Chaves, Tatiana Schor, Denis Valle, Aline S. Tavares
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Urbanization is expected to influence food transitions, resulting in a shift from wild foods to more domesticated foods. Concomitantly, food insecurity and urban demand for natural resources, including wildlife, are expected to increase overall, even when the per capita consumption is expected to decrease. These issues bring challenges to ecosystems and human well‐being. We examined how the degree of urbanization and socioeconomic factors, such as poverty and connections to rural areas, influences the consumption of and preferences for meat from wildlife (mammals, birds and turtles), fish and domesticated animals. We administered 1367 questionnaires to randomly selected households across 10 urban areas in Amazonas state, Brazil. We found that degree of urbanization was associated with a food transition from consuming wildlife and fish to consuming domesticated animals. Taste preference for meat from wildlife and fish decreased with the degree of urbanization. Rural connections were associated with increased consumption of and preference for wild meat (meat from wildlife) and fish. Poverty was associated with increased consumption of fish and processed meat and decreased consumption of beef and pork, with important implications for how food transitions affect households experiencing poverty. These results highlight the spatial, social and economic heterogeneity of consumption and preference. Policy and social interventions, such as campaigns to reduce consumption of vulnerable species or targeted enforcement against poaching, will need to consider this heterogeneity to be effective and avoid unintended consequences, such as worsening food insecurity. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.

People and Nature
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR), Princeton University (US), Princeton Public Schools (US), University of Florida (US), Instituto Maria e Joao Aleixo (BR), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (BR), University College London (GB), Universidade Federal do Amazonas (BR), Virginia Tech (US)
High Meadows Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Organic Food and Agriculture
2.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.