Abstract 4141539: Impact of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter on the Prognosis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Undergoing PCI

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, the risk of cardiovascular adverse outcome rises when it coexists with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Studies have shown that an increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) is associated with worse outcomes in various cardiovascular conditions, including heart failure, and coronary artery disease (CAD). In patients with AF, an enlarged LVEDD may indicate underlying left ventricular dysfunction and structural heart disease, which could potentially predispose to myocardial fibrosis if patients are combined with ACS. Therefore, it is essential to research the impact of LVEDD on the prognosis of patients combined with AF and ACS or PCI. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that LVEDD could be a risk factor for adverse outcomes in AF patients with ACS/PCI. Aims: This study aimed to explore the impact of LVEDD on the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with AF and ACS or undergoing PCI. Methods: This study consecutively included a total of 2,182 patients with atrial fibrillation combined with ACS or undergoing PCI from 2017 to 2019. The primary endpoint was MACEs, which represented a composite event of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolism, and massive hemorrhage. Results: The 2,182 patients were divided into two groups: LVEDD>60mm group (n=370) and LVEDD ≤60 mm group (n=1812). During a median follow-up of 36 months, patients in LVEDD>60 mm group had a higher incidence of MACEs ( 39.7% vs. 26.0%), Compared with the LVEDD ≤60 mm group. The Kaplan-Meier curves (Figure 1) compared by the log-rank test showed that patients with LVEDD>60 mm were associated with a higher risk of MACEs (P<0.001). In Table 1, LVEDD as a continuous variable and LVEDD>60 mm was independently associated with increased risk of MACEs after adjusting age, sex, BMI, AF type, CAD type, PCI, coronary artery bypass graft, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, prior hypertension, prior diabetes mellitus, troponin I, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulant drugs, statins in Model 3. The restrictive cubic spline in Figure 2 showed that LVEDD greater than 60 mm increased the risk of MACEs. An LVEDD less than 60 mm seemed to be safe for such patients. Conclusions: LVEDD can be a predictor for MACEs in patients with AF combined with ACS or undergoing PCI. Furthermore, left ventricular dilation indicates a worse prognosis for these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4141539
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4141539: Impact of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter on the Prognosis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Undergoing PCI

Yan-Min Yang, Wei Xu
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4141539: Impact of Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Diameter on the Prognosis in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Acute Coronary Syndrome or Undergoing PCI

Yan-Min Yang, Wei Xu
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia, the risk of cardiovascular adverse outcome rises when it coexists with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Studies have shown that an increased left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) is associated with worse outcomes in various cardiovascular conditions, including heart failure, and coronary artery disease (CAD). In patients with AF, an enlarged LVEDD may indicate underlying left ventricular dysfunction and structural heart disease, which could potentially predispose to myocardial fibrosis if patients are combined with ACS. Therefore, it is essential to research the impact of LVEDD on the prognosis of patients combined with AF and ACS or PCI. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that LVEDD could be a risk factor for adverse outcomes in AF patients with ACS/PCI. Aims: This study aimed to explore the impact of LVEDD on the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in patients with AF and ACS or undergoing PCI. Methods: This study consecutively included a total of 2,182 patients with atrial fibrillation combined with ACS or undergoing PCI from 2017 to 2019. The primary endpoint was MACEs, which represented a composite event of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolism, and massive hemorrhage. Results: The 2,182 patients were divided into two groups: LVEDD>60mm group (n=370) and LVEDD ≤60 mm group (n=1812). During a median follow-up of 36 months, patients in LVEDD>60 mm group had a higher incidence of MACEs ( 39.7% vs. 26.0%), Compared with the LVEDD ≤60 mm group. The Kaplan-Meier curves (Figure 1) compared by the log-rank test showed that patients with LVEDD>60 mm were associated with a higher risk of MACEs (P<0.001). In Table 1, LVEDD as a continuous variable and LVEDD>60 mm was independently associated with increased risk of MACEs after adjusting age, sex, BMI, AF type, CAD type, PCI, coronary artery bypass graft, prior myocardial infarction, prior heart failure, prior hypertension, prior diabetes mellitus, troponin I, antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulant drugs, statins in Model 3. The restrictive cubic spline in Figure 2 showed that LVEDD greater than 60 mm increased the risk of MACEs. An LVEDD less than 60 mm seemed to be safe for such patients. Conclusions: LVEDD can be a predictor for MACEs in patients with AF combined with ACS or undergoing PCI. Furthermore, left ventricular dilation indicates a worse prognosis for these patients.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Fu Wai Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.