Abstract 4140759: Clinical Outcomes Of SGLT2 Inhibitors In Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis Of Randomized Control Trials

Introduction: Acute heart failure (AHF) presents challenges due to its poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options compared to chronic heart failure (CHF). The potential benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in AHF patients are being explored, yet systematic evaluation is lacking. Our meta-analysis aims to bridge this gap by comparing the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in AHF patients. Research question: Clinical Outcomes Of SGLT2 Inhibitors In Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials involving adult patients hospitalized with AHF, who received SGLT2 inhibitors. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure events, and readmissions. The secondary outcomes were change in KCCQ-TSS (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), weight, length of stay and NT-proBNP levels. Safety outcomes included hypotension, hypoglycemia, UTI, DKA, and acute renal failure. We used Review Manager 5.4 for statistical analysis, employing standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Seven RCTs were included, involving a total of 2321 patients, with 49.5% receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. Patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors showed a significant reduction in the risk of readmissions by 32% (RR = 0.68, p < 0.00001). They also showed a non-significant but reduced risk of all-cause mortality by 24% (RR = 0.76, p = 0.04), and heart failure events by 27% (RR = 0.63, p = 0.09). With respect to the secondary outcomes, there was a significant reduction in KCCQ-TSS (SMD= -0.17; 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.08; p=0.004) and weight (SMD= -0.34; 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.13; p=0.002) in the intervention group as compared to the placebo group. This group was also associated with a non-significant but reduced length of stay (SMD= -0.01; 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.18; p=0.90) and NT-proBNP levels (SMD= -0.06; 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.17; p=0.61). On analysis of the safety outcomes, there was a non significant difference in the risk of acute renal failure, UTI, and DKA. Conclusion: In patients with AHF, initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors showed a statistically significant reduction in heart failure rehospitalizations, improved weight-based diuretic efficiency, and KCCQ-TSS. These findings suggest that starting SGLT2 inhibitors in patients hospitalized for AHF is well tolerated and leads to clinical benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140759
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140759: Clinical Outcomes Of SGLT2 Inhibitors In Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis Of Randomized Control Trials

Aditya Thakkar, Soumya Gupta, James W. Choi, Kiran Mahmood et al.
Circulation
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4140759: Clinical Outcomes Of SGLT2 Inhibitors In Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure: A Meta-analysis Of Randomized Control Trials

Aditya Thakkar, Soumya Gupta, James W. Choi, Kiran Mahmood, Won-Joon Koh, Hannah Hart
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute heart failure (AHF) presents challenges due to its poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options compared to chronic heart failure (CHF). The potential benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors in AHF patients are being explored, yet systematic evaluation is lacking. Our meta-analysis aims to bridge this gap by comparing the efficacy and safety of SGLT2 inhibitors versus placebo in AHF patients. Research question: Clinical Outcomes Of SGLT2 Inhibitors In Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials involving adult patients hospitalized with AHF, who received SGLT2 inhibitors. Our primary outcomes were all-cause mortality, heart failure events, and readmissions. The secondary outcomes were change in KCCQ-TSS (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire), weight, length of stay and NT-proBNP levels. Safety outcomes included hypotension, hypoglycemia, UTI, DKA, and acute renal failure. We used Review Manager 5.4 for statistical analysis, employing standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Seven RCTs were included, involving a total of 2321 patients, with 49.5% receiving SGLT2 inhibitors. Patients receiving SGLT2 inhibitors showed a significant reduction in the risk of readmissions by 32% (RR = 0.68, p < 0.00001). They also showed a non-significant but reduced risk of all-cause mortality by 24% (RR = 0.76, p = 0.04), and heart failure events by 27% (RR = 0.63, p = 0.09). With respect to the secondary outcomes, there was a significant reduction in KCCQ-TSS (SMD= -0.17; 95% CI: -0.26 to -0.08; p=0.004) and weight (SMD= -0.34; 95% CI: -0.55 to -0.13; p=0.002) in the intervention group as compared to the placebo group. This group was also associated with a non-significant but reduced length of stay (SMD= -0.01; 95% CI: -0.20 to -0.18; p=0.90) and NT-proBNP levels (SMD= -0.06; 95% CI: -0.29 to -0.17; p=0.61). On analysis of the safety outcomes, there was a non significant difference in the risk of acute renal failure, UTI, and DKA. Conclusion: In patients with AHF, initiation of SGLT2 inhibitors showed a statistically significant reduction in heart failure rehospitalizations, improved weight-based diuretic efficiency, and KCCQ-TSS. These findings suggest that starting SGLT2 inhibitors in patients hospitalized for AHF is well tolerated and leads to clinical benefits.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
East Tennessee State University (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.