Abstract 4141319: Enhancing Prognostic Prediction in STEMI Patients: The Incremental Value of Computational Pressure-Fluid Dynamics Applied to Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

Background: The computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to index of microcirculatory resistance, derived from coronary angiography (CPFD-caIMR) is a promising alternative method of IMR to evaluate the prognosis of STEMI patients. This study aim to evaluate the incremental value CPFD-caIMR and MVO in predicting MACE after patients with undergoing primary percutaneous coronary PPCI. Methods: A total of 292 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected retrospectively from 1107 STEMI patients from January 2019 to January 2021 in Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University in China. All patients with STEMI underwent CPFD-caIMR and MVO assessment. The patients were categorized into four groups based on CPFD-caIMR and MVO presence: 1) CPFD-caIMR ≤40U without MVO; 2) CPFD-caIMR >40U without MVO; 3) CPFD-caIMR ≤40U with MVO; and 4) CPFD-caIMR >40U with MVO. The primary endpoint of the study was MACE, defined as cardiovascular or all-cause deaths, non-fatal MI, revascularization including target vessel reconstruction, heart failure readmission. Results: Within the included 292 patients, a notable proportion of 101 cases (34.6%) revealed discrepancies between CPFD-caIMR and MVO. Among these, 103 patients (35.3%) exhibited CPFD-caIMR values of ≤40 without MVO, while 88 patients (30.1%) displayed CPFD-caIMR values of >40 with MVO on CMR. Both MVO (HR: 2.750, p=0.033) and CPFD-IMR>40U (HR: 3.572, p=0.001]) were predictors of MACE over 12 months. Specifically, for every 1-unit increase in CPFD-IMR>40U, MACE increased by 3.572 units. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that CPFD-caIMR>40U (AUC, 0.724, p<0.001) and MVO (AUC, 0.667, p=0.001) were effective in predicting MACE. Notably, combined CPFD-caIMR and MVO increased the area under the curve for MACE to 0.820, p<0.001). Over 12 month of follow-up, Group 4 (HR: 8.765, p <0.001) but not Group 3 (HR: 3.474, p=0.029), Group 2(HR:3.554, p=0.045) had worse clinical outcomes compared with those with no significant CMD in Group 1. Conclusion: CPFD-caIMR is a novel method for noninvasive detection of microvascular reperfusion failure, and CPFD-caIMR > 40U can predict the prognosis of STEMI patients.When combined with CMR, CPFD-caIMR > 40U can be used to further stratify the risk of STEMI and to identify high-risk patients who may require more aggressive treatment during follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4141319
Primary Topic
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4141319: Enhancing Prognostic Prediction in STEMI Patients: The Incremental Value of Computational Pressure-Fluid Dynamics Applied to Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

Yafeng Zhou, Junyi Zhang, Yang Duan
Circulation
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
article

Abstract 4141319: Enhancing Prognostic Prediction in STEMI Patients: The Incremental Value of Computational Pressure-Fluid Dynamics Applied to Index of Microcirculatory Resistance

Yafeng Zhou, Junyi Zhang, Yang Duan
article en

Abstract

Background: The computational pressure-fluid dynamics applied to index of microcirculatory resistance, derived from coronary angiography (CPFD-caIMR) is a promising alternative method of IMR to evaluate the prognosis of STEMI patients. This study aim to evaluate the incremental value CPFD-caIMR and MVO in predicting MACE after patients with undergoing primary percutaneous coronary PPCI. Methods: A total of 292 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected retrospectively from 1107 STEMI patients from January 2019 to January 2021 in Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University in China. All patients with STEMI underwent CPFD-caIMR and MVO assessment. The patients were categorized into four groups based on CPFD-caIMR and MVO presence: 1) CPFD-caIMR ≤40U without MVO; 2) CPFD-caIMR >40U without MVO; 3) CPFD-caIMR ≤40U with MVO; and 4) CPFD-caIMR >40U with MVO. The primary endpoint of the study was MACE, defined as cardiovascular or all-cause deaths, non-fatal MI, revascularization including target vessel reconstruction, heart failure readmission. Results: Within the included 292 patients, a notable proportion of 101 cases (34.6%) revealed discrepancies between CPFD-caIMR and MVO. Among these, 103 patients (35.3%) exhibited CPFD-caIMR values of ≤40 without MVO, while 88 patients (30.1%) displayed CPFD-caIMR values of >40 with MVO on CMR. Both MVO (HR: 2.750, p=0.033) and CPFD-IMR>40U (HR: 3.572, p=0.001]) were predictors of MACE over 12 months. Specifically, for every 1-unit increase in CPFD-IMR>40U, MACE increased by 3.572 units. Furthermore, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that CPFD-caIMR>40U (AUC, 0.724, p<0.001) and MVO (AUC, 0.667, p=0.001) were effective in predicting MACE. Notably, combined CPFD-caIMR and MVO increased the area under the curve for MACE to 0.820, p<0.001). Over 12 month of follow-up, Group 4 (HR: 8.765, p <0.001) but not Group 3 (HR: 3.474, p=0.029), Group 2(HR:3.554, p=0.045) had worse clinical outcomes compared with those with no significant CMD in Group 1. Conclusion: CPFD-caIMR is a novel method for noninvasive detection of microvascular reperfusion failure, and CPFD-caIMR > 40U can predict the prognosis of STEMI patients.When combined with CMR, CPFD-caIMR > 40U can be used to further stratify the risk of STEMI and to identify high-risk patients who may require more aggressive treatment during follow-up.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Soochow University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (CN), The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou Dushu Lake Hospital)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.