Abstract 4141596: Machine Learning Model Predicting In-Hospital Mortality for Cardiogenic Shock

Background: Cardiogenic shock *CS) confers a high mortality (30-50%). A key limitation of existing CS mortality models is the reliance on static parameters measured at admission which ignore the rapidly evolving natural history of CS. Hypothesis: A machine learning (ML) model that incorporates time series electronic health record (EHR) data including echocardiogram reports and invasive hemodynamics will accurately predict mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock Methods: Patients with an ICD-10 code of cardiogenic shock were identified using electronic health data (EHR) from 2015 - 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of in hospital mortality or discharge to hospice. We incorporated EHR data obtained within the first 24 hours of admission including demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, lab values, medication administration, use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), echocardiogram data, electrocardiogram reports, and hemodynamics from pulmonary artery catheter or right heart catheterization. For dynamic values such as lab values we incorporated six hour, 12 hour, and 24 hours trends as well as maximum and minimum values. We used a LightGBM model with 70/10/20 split for training, hyperparameter fine-tuning, and testing. Results: We identified 5,048 total admissions. Median age was 65 years (IQR 52, 72) and 64% were male. Twenty five percent presented with acute myocardial infarction and 12% with cardiac arrest. The MCS distribution was: 17% intra-aortic balloon pump and 6% VA-ECMO. All-cause mortality was 32%. Our model demonstrated robust discrimination (AUROC 0.804), precision (0.699), and calibration (expected calibration error 3.2%). The five highest importance features were age at admission, mean serum albumin, mean glascow coma score, mean platelet value in the first six hours of admission, and total urine output. Our model performed favorably to a previously developed cardiogenic shock mortality risk scores (IABP SHOCK II: AUROC 0.71, AUPRC 0.55 in our cohort). Conclusion: This ML CS mortality model incorporating dynamic, time series EHR data capturing the trajectory of CS in the first 24 hours after amission has high precision and discrimination. This ML model could be readily embedded into EHR systems to allow for rapid risk statification at the bed-side.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4141596
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4141596: Machine Learning Model Predicting In-Hospital Mortality for Cardiogenic Shock

Suresh Balu, William Ratliff, Henry P. Foote, Ajar Kochar
Circulation
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Abstract 4141596: Machine Learning Model Predicting In-Hospital Mortality for Cardiogenic Shock

Suresh Balu, William Ratliff, Henry P. Foote, Ajar Kochar
article en

Abstract

Background: Cardiogenic shock *CS) confers a high mortality (30-50%). A key limitation of existing CS mortality models is the reliance on static parameters measured at admission which ignore the rapidly evolving natural history of CS. Hypothesis: A machine learning (ML) model that incorporates time series electronic health record (EHR) data including echocardiogram reports and invasive hemodynamics will accurately predict mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock Methods: Patients with an ICD-10 code of cardiogenic shock were identified using electronic health data (EHR) from 2015 - 2019. The primary outcome was a composite of in hospital mortality or discharge to hospice. We incorporated EHR data obtained within the first 24 hours of admission including demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, lab values, medication administration, use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS), echocardiogram data, electrocardiogram reports, and hemodynamics from pulmonary artery catheter or right heart catheterization. For dynamic values such as lab values we incorporated six hour, 12 hour, and 24 hours trends as well as maximum and minimum values. We used a LightGBM model with 70/10/20 split for training, hyperparameter fine-tuning, and testing. Results: We identified 5,048 total admissions. Median age was 65 years (IQR 52, 72) and 64% were male. Twenty five percent presented with acute myocardial infarction and 12% with cardiac arrest. The MCS distribution was: 17% intra-aortic balloon pump and 6% VA-ECMO. All-cause mortality was 32%. Our model demonstrated robust discrimination (AUROC 0.804), precision (0.699), and calibration (expected calibration error 3.2%). The five highest importance features were age at admission, mean serum albumin, mean glascow coma score, mean platelet value in the first six hours of admission, and total urine output. Our model performed favorably to a previously developed cardiogenic shock mortality risk scores (IABP SHOCK II: AUROC 0.71, AUPRC 0.55 in our cohort). Conclusion: This ML CS mortality model incorporating dynamic, time series EHR data capturing the trajectory of CS in the first 24 hours after amission has high precision and discrimination. This ML model could be readily embedded into EHR systems to allow for rapid risk statification at the bed-side.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Duke University (US), Chestnut Hill College (US), Duke Institute for Health Innovation (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.