The Interpretation of Nicene Christology at the Council of Alexandria (c. 370) and Its Revision

Although the Council of Nicaea (325) has already been copiously discussed, the document of the Council of Alexandria (370) still offers a fresh insight into the interpretation of the former Council’s teaching and into its reception. This article is a theological analysis of the conciliar document, written by Athanasius of Alexandria: Letter to the African Bishops against the Arians. The document draws attention to the concept of substance (ousia), which was rejected by the Arians as not biblical. The Council disagreed with the Arians’ claim, presented the biblical foundation of this term and used the formula: “the Son is of the substance of God,” which means that the Son is consubstantial (homoousios) with the Father. Ultimately, the Council of Alexandria agreed on the Homoiousian formula of the Son’s resemblance “in substance” to the Father (kat’ ousian). A revision of the conciliar teaching allows us to discover in God the permanent basis (substance) of life and the Greatest Good (hyparxis), incomparable with other goods (Jer 9:9 and Heb 10:34).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Collectanea Theologica
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21697/ct.2024.94.4.02
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Theology and Canon Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Interpretation of Nicene Christology at the Council of Alexandria (c. 370) and Its Revision

Włodzimierz Wołyniec
1 citations
Collectanea Theologica
Theology and Canon Law Studies
8.39
article

The Interpretation of Nicene Christology at the Council of Alexandria (c. 370) and Its Revision

Włodzimierz Wołyniec
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Although the Council of Nicaea (325) has already been copiously discussed, the document of the Council of Alexandria (370) still offers a fresh insight into the interpretation of the former Council’s teaching and into its reception. This article is a theological analysis of the conciliar document, written by Athanasius of Alexandria: Letter to the African Bishops against the Arians. The document draws attention to the concept of substance (ousia), which was rejected by the Arians as not biblical. The Council disagreed with the Arians’ claim, presented the biblical foundation of this term and used the formula: “the Son is of the substance of God,” which means that the Son is consubstantial (homoousios) with the Father. Ultimately, the Council of Alexandria agreed on the Homoiousian formula of the Son’s resemblance “in substance” to the Father (kat’ ousian). A revision of the conciliar teaching allows us to discover in God the permanent basis (substance) of life and the Greatest Good (hyparxis), incomparable with other goods (Jer 9:9 and Heb 10:34).

Collectanea TheologicaVol. 94(4)
Papieski Wydział Teologiczny we Wrocławiu (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Theology and Canon Law Studies
8.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.