Abstract 4141710: Artificial Intelligence Guided Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Standard-Of-Care in Stable Chest Pain Syndromes

Background: Stress perfusion CMR has excellent diagnostic and prognostic values in assessing chest pain syndromes. AI-guided methods may overcome complex scanning and increase clinical adaptation of stress CMR. Aim: To assess the benefits of AI-guided stress perfusion CMR. Methods: Consecutive patients with stable chest pain underwent stress CMR using either a standard scanning method (SOC) or an AI-assist (AIA) machine learning protocol to automate scan planning, plane prescription, sequence tuning, and image reconstruction. Scan duration, the ratio of scan preparation time over the entire scan duration, and scan quality using a 5-point scale were compared between AIA and SOC. Cox regression models were constructed to associate evidence of ischemia on stress CMR, by either scanning method, with composite endpoints including cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, unstable angina hospitalization, and late CABG. A second composite endpoint included the performance of additional cardiac imaging tests (stress imaging and CCTA) and invasive coronary procedures after CMR. Results: Among 594 patients (62.8 ± 14 years), 29% underwent stress CMR with AIA. 26% had stress-perfusion ischemia, and 39% had LGE present. AIA stress CMR had lower scan duration (median 44.0 [IQR 40-47] vs. 52.5 min [IQR 46-60]; p<0.001), lower preparation time ratio (median 0.11 [IQR 0.09-0.15] vs. 0.21 [IQR 0.16-0.31], p<0.001) and a higher mean image quality score (mean 4.2±0.7 vs. 3.9±0.6; p<0.001) compared to SOC. There was a trend to a lower risk of experiencing the clinical composite endpoint and a lower need to undergo subsequent noninvasive testing among the AIA group (log-rank p=0.33 and p=0.08). Among the 152 patients with ischemia present, the incidence of invasive referral and performance of coronary revascularization within 90 days were not different. Conclusions: In this non-randomized observational cohort, AIA significantly improved stress CMR scan duration, preparation time ratio, and image quality compared to SOC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4141710
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4141710: Artificial Intelligence Guided Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Standard-Of-Care in Stable Chest Pain Syndromes

Lori Powell, Benedikt Bernhard, Isabela Reis Marques, Bobak Heydari et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4141710: Artificial Intelligence Guided Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Standard-Of-Care in Stable Chest Pain Syndromes

Lori Powell, Benedikt Bernhard, Isabela Reis Marques, Bobak Heydari, Michael Jerosch‐Herold, Marianna Daibes, Raymond Y. Kwong, Bob S. Hu, Juan M. Santos, Okai Addy
article en

Abstract

Background: Stress perfusion CMR has excellent diagnostic and prognostic values in assessing chest pain syndromes. AI-guided methods may overcome complex scanning and increase clinical adaptation of stress CMR. Aim: To assess the benefits of AI-guided stress perfusion CMR. Methods: Consecutive patients with stable chest pain underwent stress CMR using either a standard scanning method (SOC) or an AI-assist (AIA) machine learning protocol to automate scan planning, plane prescription, sequence tuning, and image reconstruction. Scan duration, the ratio of scan preparation time over the entire scan duration, and scan quality using a 5-point scale were compared between AIA and SOC. Cox regression models were constructed to associate evidence of ischemia on stress CMR, by either scanning method, with composite endpoints including cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, unstable angina hospitalization, and late CABG. A second composite endpoint included the performance of additional cardiac imaging tests (stress imaging and CCTA) and invasive coronary procedures after CMR. Results: Among 594 patients (62.8 ± 14 years), 29% underwent stress CMR with AIA. 26% had stress-perfusion ischemia, and 39% had LGE present. AIA stress CMR had lower scan duration (median 44.0 [IQR 40-47] vs. 52.5 min [IQR 46-60]; p<0.001), lower preparation time ratio (median 0.11 [IQR 0.09-0.15] vs. 0.21 [IQR 0.16-0.31], p<0.001) and a higher mean image quality score (mean 4.2±0.7 vs. 3.9±0.6; p<0.001) compared to SOC. There was a trend to a lower risk of experiencing the clinical composite endpoint and a lower need to undergo subsequent noninvasive testing among the AIA group (log-rank p=0.33 and p=0.08). Among the 152 patients with ischemia present, the incidence of invasive referral and performance of coronary revascularization within 90 days were not different. Conclusions: In this non-randomized observational cohort, AIA significantly improved stress CMR scan duration, preparation time ratio, and image quality compared to SOC.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.