Mimetic accumulation: Marx, Foucault, and Adorno in and with Federici’s <i>Caliban and the Witch</i>

Silvia Federici's Caliban and the Witch is a landmark text in Marxist feminism, rethinking capitalism's development from and with the standpoint of women. In this paper, I trace Federici's theory and use of the Marxist concept of primitive accumulation through both Marx and Foucault, the two central interlocutors employed to analyze the perpetuity of violence following the explicit violence of capital's originary privatization. After understanding Federici's reading of the dialectical double helix of violence and compulsion via Marx, and the relation of capital (as Reason and Order) to the body via Foucault, I position Adorno as a backdrop against which to view Federici’s thesis on primitive accumulation. Despite the innumerable theoretical similarities between Adorno and Federici, a close pairing shows what Caliban and the Witch misses in its final pages: a theory of mimesis—mimetic accumulation—that accounts for the dialectic of primitive accumulation's perpetuity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thesis Eleven
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136241296891
Primary Topic
Art, Politics, and Modernism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mimetic accumulation: Marx, Foucault, and Adorno in and with Federici’s Caliban and the Witch

Jake Sokolofsky
Thesis Eleven
Art, Politics, and Modernism
article

Mimetic accumulation: Marx, Foucault, and Adorno in and with Federici’s Caliban and the Witch

Jake Sokolofsky
article en

Abstract

Silvia Federici's Caliban and the Witch is a landmark text in Marxist feminism, rethinking capitalism's development from and with the standpoint of women. In this paper, I trace Federici's theory and use of the Marxist concept of primitive accumulation through both Marx and Foucault, the two central interlocutors employed to analyze the perpetuity of violence following the explicit violence of capital's originary privatization. After understanding Federici's reading of the dialectical double helix of violence and compulsion via Marx, and the relation of capital (as Reason and Order) to the body via Foucault, I position Adorno as a backdrop against which to view Federici’s thesis on primitive accumulation. Despite the innumerable theoretical similarities between Adorno and Federici, a close pairing shows what Caliban and the Witch misses in its final pages: a theory of mimesis—mimetic accumulation—that accounts for the dialectic of primitive accumulation's perpetuity.

Thesis ElevenVol. 184-185(1)
Williams College (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Art, Politics, and Modernism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mimetic accumulation: Marx, Foucault, and Adorno in and with Federici’s <i>Caliban and the Witch</i> — Jake Sokolofsky · Thesis Eleven (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS