Abstract 4141921: Hydration to prevent acute kidney injury after pulsed field ablation: importance of timing and fluids amount

Previous studies have highlighted the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) development, underlining the need for strategies to mitigate this complication. We analyzed 208 consecutive patients who underwent pulsed field ablation (PFA) for post-FDA approval. All patients received pulmonary vein isolation. Ablation of extra-PV sites was performed per the operator’s choice, with no contrast agents . Serum creatinine was measured in all patients at baseline and 24 after ablation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of hydration timing and the amount of fluids on incidence of AKI in patients undergoing PFA. Group means for continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. A ROC analysis was done to evaluate the predictive model of PFA applications to evaluate AKI. All tests were two-tailed and conducted at an α level of 0.05. We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 (n=102) received either one liter of saline pre-procedure or one liter pre-procedure followed by a liter post-procedure; Group 2 (n=106) was preemptively hydrated with two liters of saline before the procedure, followed by additional 500cc if the patient had received more than 100 PF applications. Baseline Characteristics of population are described in Fig.1a . In the comparative analysis of the two groups, there was no significant difference regarding the number of PFA applications administered. None of the patients in Group 2 experienced AKI, while Group 1 AKI occurred in 9 patients. (0/106 vs 9/102, p-value=0.0034). The ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.709 ± 0.107 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.498 to 0.919 (p-value=0.035). An optimal PF application cutoff point of 105.50 was determined, associating a higher probability of AKI with PFA applications exceeding this threshold (sensitivity:0.667, specificity:0.735, Youden's index:0.402) ( Fig.1b ). Among the 9 patients who developed AKI, we observed that 7 received more than 100PF applications; the remaining 2 patients, each with baseline stage 3 chronic kidney disease and prior episodes of AKI following surgeries, received 54 and 50PF applications, respectively. In this series of patients, pre-procedural hydration with two liters of fluids eliminated the risk of AKI even in patients who received a high number of PFA applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4141921
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Restraint-Related Deaths
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4141921: Hydration to prevent acute kidney injury after pulsed field ablation: importance of timing and fluids amount

Sanghamitra Mohanty, Luigi Di Biase, Carola Gianni, Amin Al‐Ahmad et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Restraint-Related Deaths
0.69
article

Abstract 4141921: Hydration to prevent acute kidney injury after pulsed field ablation: importance of timing and fluids amount

Sanghamitra Mohanty, Luigi Di Biase, Carola Gianni, Amin Al‐Ahmad, Weeranun D. Bode, Domenico Giovanni Della Rocca, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Prem Geeta Torlapati, Andrea Natale, Joseph Gallinghouse
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Previous studies have highlighted the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) development, underlining the need for strategies to mitigate this complication. We analyzed 208 consecutive patients who underwent pulsed field ablation (PFA) for post-FDA approval. All patients received pulmonary vein isolation. Ablation of extra-PV sites was performed per the operator’s choice, with no contrast agents . Serum creatinine was measured in all patients at baseline and 24 after ablation. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of hydration timing and the amount of fluids on incidence of AKI in patients undergoing PFA. Group means for continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test. Categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test. A ROC analysis was done to evaluate the predictive model of PFA applications to evaluate AKI. All tests were two-tailed and conducted at an α level of 0.05. We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 (n=102) received either one liter of saline pre-procedure or one liter pre-procedure followed by a liter post-procedure; Group 2 (n=106) was preemptively hydrated with two liters of saline before the procedure, followed by additional 500cc if the patient had received more than 100 PF applications. Baseline Characteristics of population are described in Fig.1a . In the comparative analysis of the two groups, there was no significant difference regarding the number of PFA applications administered. None of the patients in Group 2 experienced AKI, while Group 1 AKI occurred in 9 patients. (0/106 vs 9/102, p-value=0.0034). The ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.709 ± 0.107 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.498 to 0.919 (p-value=0.035). An optimal PF application cutoff point of 105.50 was determined, associating a higher probability of AKI with PFA applications exceeding this threshold (sensitivity:0.667, specificity:0.735, Youden's index:0.402) ( Fig.1b ). Among the 9 patients who developed AKI, we observed that 7 received more than 100PF applications; the remaining 2 patients, each with baseline stage 3 chronic kidney disease and prior episodes of AKI following surgeries, received 54 and 50PF applications, respectively. In this series of patients, pre-procedural hydration with two liters of fluids eliminated the risk of AKI even in patients who received a high number of PFA applications.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Restraint-Related Deaths
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.