Abstract 4142030: A Polygenic Score to Identify Risk of Incident Stroke and Benefit from Primary Prevention Statin Therapy

Background: Primary prevention statin use has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of stroke, however, clinical risk scores for statin eligibility do not predict stroke specifically. A polygenic risk score (PRS) for stroke is a tool that may help identify individuals at greatest risk of stroke and most likely to benefit from statin therapy. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study using genotyped individuals from a large primary prevention RCT (JUPITER), which tested rosuvastatin 20 mg daily vs placebo. We applied the validated GIGASTROKE PRS categorized by quintiles: low (Q1), moderate (Q2-Q4) or high risk (Q5). The primary outcome was occurrence of all-cause stroke. PRS risk was modeled per 1-SD and hazard ratios calculated for the moderate and high-risk groups relative to low risk. Formal testing of treatment interaction for rosuvastatin and PRS was performed. Results: Of 8,749 patients with genetic data (32% male, mean age 66), the median LDL-C was 110 mg/dL and hsCRP was 4.05 mg/L. During 4 years of follow up, 44 patients suffered a stroke. The PRS was strongly associated with risk of incident stroke ( Fig, A ). Compared to those at low genetic risk, the absolute risk of stroke was more than 2-fold greater in the moderate group (HR: 2.10, 0.78-5.67) and nearly 4-fold greater in the high-risk group (HR: 3.72, 1.27-10.88, p-trend =0.011). In this genetic cohort, rosuvastatin reduced the risk of stroke by 61% (HR: 0.39, 0.20-0.76, p=0.006). The relative risk reductions with rosuvastatin were 37% (HR 0.63, 0.11-3.77), 63% (HR 0.37, 0.16-0.88), and 68% (HR 0.32, 0.09-1.17) in low, moderate, and high-risk groups, respectively. The absolute risk reductions with rosuvastatin were 0.13% (-0.38-0.63), 0.46% (0.08-0.84), and 0.76% (-0.03-1.56) ( Fig, B) . Rosuvastatin in the high-risk subgroup reduced the incidence of stroke to the level of the low-risk subgroup receiving placebo (0.35%). Conclusion: A PRS can identify primary prevention patients with a 2 to 4-fold increased risk of stroke, which appears to be largely offset with statin therapy. As the use of PRSs increase in clinical practice, it may be a useful tool to help guide statin initiation for primary stroke prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142030
Primary Topic
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4142030: A Polygenic Score to Identify Risk of Incident Stroke and Benefit from Primary Prevention Statin Therapy

Daniel I. Chasman, Daniel J. McClintick, Christian T. Ruff, Frederick Kamanu et al.
3 links
Circulation
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
article

Abstract 4142030: A Polygenic Score to Identify Risk of Incident Stroke and Benefit from Primary Prevention Statin Therapy

Daniel I. Chasman, Daniel J. McClintick, Christian T. Ruff, Frederick Kamanu, Marc S. Sabatine, Giorgio Melloni, Nicholas Marston, Paul M. Ridker
article en

Abstract

Background: Primary prevention statin use has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of stroke, however, clinical risk scores for statin eligibility do not predict stroke specifically. A polygenic risk score (PRS) for stroke is a tool that may help identify individuals at greatest risk of stroke and most likely to benefit from statin therapy. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort study using genotyped individuals from a large primary prevention RCT (JUPITER), which tested rosuvastatin 20 mg daily vs placebo. We applied the validated GIGASTROKE PRS categorized by quintiles: low (Q1), moderate (Q2-Q4) or high risk (Q5). The primary outcome was occurrence of all-cause stroke. PRS risk was modeled per 1-SD and hazard ratios calculated for the moderate and high-risk groups relative to low risk. Formal testing of treatment interaction for rosuvastatin and PRS was performed. Results: Of 8,749 patients with genetic data (32% male, mean age 66), the median LDL-C was 110 mg/dL and hsCRP was 4.05 mg/L. During 4 years of follow up, 44 patients suffered a stroke. The PRS was strongly associated with risk of incident stroke ( Fig, A ). Compared to those at low genetic risk, the absolute risk of stroke was more than 2-fold greater in the moderate group (HR: 2.10, 0.78-5.67) and nearly 4-fold greater in the high-risk group (HR: 3.72, 1.27-10.88, p-trend =0.011). In this genetic cohort, rosuvastatin reduced the risk of stroke by 61% (HR: 0.39, 0.20-0.76, p=0.006). The relative risk reductions with rosuvastatin were 37% (HR 0.63, 0.11-3.77), 63% (HR 0.37, 0.16-0.88), and 68% (HR 0.32, 0.09-1.17) in low, moderate, and high-risk groups, respectively. The absolute risk reductions with rosuvastatin were 0.13% (-0.38-0.63), 0.46% (0.08-0.84), and 0.76% (-0.03-1.56) ( Fig, B) . Rosuvastatin in the high-risk subgroup reduced the incidence of stroke to the level of the low-risk subgroup receiving placebo (0.35%). Conclusion: A PRS can identify primary prevention patients with a 2 to 4-fold increased risk of stroke, which appears to be largely offset with statin therapy. As the use of PRSs increase in clinical practice, it may be a useful tool to help guide statin initiation for primary stroke prevention.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.