Abstract 4143027: Impact of Variants of Uncertain Significance on Mortality, Heart Failure,&Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Single Ventricle Disease

Background&Hypothesis: Single ventricle disease (SVD) is a subtype of congenital heart disease that frequently requires early staged surgical intervention for survival. It is well known that syndromic causes of SVD are associated with worse outcomes. However, the overall effect of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) found on chromosomal microarray (CMA) has not been explored. We hypothesized that VUSs impart no significant effect on clinical outcomes for patients with SVD when compared to normal chromosomal findings while pathogenic variants have a negative impact on mortality and heart failure. Objective: To explore the impact of CMA VUSs on outcomes in patients with SVD. Methods: We conducted a review of consecutive patients with SVD born between 1985-2023 with a CMA and treated at our institution. Primary outcomes included heart failure, heart transplantation, cardiac arrest, and mortality. Secondary outcomes included gastrostomy tube (G-tube) insertion, tracheostomy, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We controlled for possible confounding factors such as gestational age, birth weight, and age at diagnosis. Rates of primary and secondary outcomes were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Freedom from event curves were generated using a log-rank test for comparison. Results: The cohort included 322 consecutive single ventricle patients. The CMA results showed 248 (77.02%) patients having normal CMAs, 42 (13.04%) with VUSs, and 32 (9.94%) with abnormal/pathogenic results. Of those with abnormal CMAs, 22 (68.75%) had a chromosomal abnormality associated with a known genetic syndrome. Analysis using Fisher’s exact test showed lower rates of cardiac arrest and G-tube insertion in VUSs compared to abnormal CMAs (p < 0.05). The one-year survival curve showed higher survival in the normal CMA group compared to the abnormal CMA group (p < 0.05). The cardiac arrest freedom from event curve showed lower event rates in the VUS and normal CMA group compared to the abnormal CMA group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in outcomes between VUSs and normal CMAs. Conclusions: Individuals with SVD and a VUS on CMA have survival rates comparable to those with normal CMAs. In contrast, abnormal CMAs are associated with reduced survival. These findings suggest that VUSs and normal CMAs may be less susceptible to cardiac arrest which is a critical complication of SVD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143027
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4143027: Impact of Variants of Uncertain Significance on Mortality, Heart Failure,&Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Single Ventricle Disease

Andrew Paul Landstrom, Jennifer L. Cohen, Sarah Tallent, Henry P. Foote et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4143027: Impact of Variants of Uncertain Significance on Mortality, Heart Failure,&Cardiac Arrest in Patients with Single Ventricle Disease

Andrew Paul Landstrom, Jennifer L. Cohen, Sarah Tallent, Henry P. Foote, Saige M. Mitchell, Brittany Balint
article en

Abstract

Background&Hypothesis: Single ventricle disease (SVD) is a subtype of congenital heart disease that frequently requires early staged surgical intervention for survival. It is well known that syndromic causes of SVD are associated with worse outcomes. However, the overall effect of variants of uncertain significance (VUSs) found on chromosomal microarray (CMA) has not been explored. We hypothesized that VUSs impart no significant effect on clinical outcomes for patients with SVD when compared to normal chromosomal findings while pathogenic variants have a negative impact on mortality and heart failure. Objective: To explore the impact of CMA VUSs on outcomes in patients with SVD. Methods: We conducted a review of consecutive patients with SVD born between 1985-2023 with a CMA and treated at our institution. Primary outcomes included heart failure, heart transplantation, cardiac arrest, and mortality. Secondary outcomes included gastrostomy tube (G-tube) insertion, tracheostomy, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We controlled for possible confounding factors such as gestational age, birth weight, and age at diagnosis. Rates of primary and secondary outcomes were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Freedom from event curves were generated using a log-rank test for comparison. Results: The cohort included 322 consecutive single ventricle patients. The CMA results showed 248 (77.02%) patients having normal CMAs, 42 (13.04%) with VUSs, and 32 (9.94%) with abnormal/pathogenic results. Of those with abnormal CMAs, 22 (68.75%) had a chromosomal abnormality associated with a known genetic syndrome. Analysis using Fisher’s exact test showed lower rates of cardiac arrest and G-tube insertion in VUSs compared to abnormal CMAs (p < 0.05). The one-year survival curve showed higher survival in the normal CMA group compared to the abnormal CMA group (p < 0.05). The cardiac arrest freedom from event curve showed lower event rates in the VUS and normal CMA group compared to the abnormal CMA group (p < 0.05). There was no difference in outcomes between VUSs and normal CMAs. Conclusions: Individuals with SVD and a VUS on CMA have survival rates comparable to those with normal CMAs. In contrast, abnormal CMAs are associated with reduced survival. These findings suggest that VUSs and normal CMAs may be less susceptible to cardiac arrest which is a critical complication of SVD.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Duke University (US), Duke Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.