Abstract 4142449: The Impact of a Closed Unit Model on Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Outcomes: A Before-After Study

Background: The ‘closed unit model’ is increasingly being adopted as a model for providing critical care to cardiac patients in contemporary intensive care units (ICU), where patients are under the direct care of an intensivist-led primary team. Many data demonstrates improved outcomes in various other intensive care settings, but few data exist in the context of cardiology intensive care. We aim to assess the clinical implications of adopting a closed unit model in our cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) across a variety of parameters. Hypothesis: Adoption of a closed unit model will result in improvement in mortality rate, ICU length of stay (LOS), and spontaneous awakening trial (SAT) and spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) compliance. Methods: We performed a before—after retrospective comparison of patients admitted to the CICU at our tertiary care hospital after adoption of a closed unit model on 1 January. The study period was the first 3 months after adoption of the closed model, with the 3-months preceding adoption of the closed model serving as the comparison group. Mortality, SAT and SBT rates were compared using the Chi-squared test and median CICU LOS was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: 751 individual patients were admitted to the CICU and analyzed (380 before vs 371 after adoption). The mortality rate significantly improved (10% vs 6.7%; p=<0.01; Figure 1). Despite this, there was no significant change in median LOS (2.7 days [IQR 1.11-5.73] vs 2.5, [IQR 1.16-6.14]; p=0.54). There was also a significant improvement in SAT (66.8% vs. 73.6%; p=<0.01) and SBT rates (90.3% vs. 94.6%; p=<0.01; Figure 1). Conclusions: Adoption of a closed unit model resulted in a statistically significant improvement in CICU mortality and daily SAT and SBT compliance, although surprisingly there was no improvement in LOS. These findings suggest that our transition to a closed unit model enhanced our patient's outcomes likely through promoting improved adherence to evidence-based critical care principles. Further study is needed to explore the factors contributing to the unchanged LOS and to better evaluate the long-term impact of a closed unit model on outcomes and resource utilization in cardiac ICUs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142449
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4142449: The Impact of a Closed Unit Model on Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Outcomes: A Before-After Study

Colin Hinkamp, Mourad H. Senussi, Matthew Nardi
Circulation
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Abstract 4142449: The Impact of a Closed Unit Model on Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Outcomes: A Before-After Study

Colin Hinkamp, Mourad H. Senussi, Matthew Nardi
article en

Abstract

Background: The ‘closed unit model’ is increasingly being adopted as a model for providing critical care to cardiac patients in contemporary intensive care units (ICU), where patients are under the direct care of an intensivist-led primary team. Many data demonstrates improved outcomes in various other intensive care settings, but few data exist in the context of cardiology intensive care. We aim to assess the clinical implications of adopting a closed unit model in our cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) across a variety of parameters. Hypothesis: Adoption of a closed unit model will result in improvement in mortality rate, ICU length of stay (LOS), and spontaneous awakening trial (SAT) and spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) compliance. Methods: We performed a before—after retrospective comparison of patients admitted to the CICU at our tertiary care hospital after adoption of a closed unit model on 1 January. The study period was the first 3 months after adoption of the closed model, with the 3-months preceding adoption of the closed model serving as the comparison group. Mortality, SAT and SBT rates were compared using the Chi-squared test and median CICU LOS was compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Results: 751 individual patients were admitted to the CICU and analyzed (380 before vs 371 after adoption). The mortality rate significantly improved (10% vs 6.7%; p=<0.01; Figure 1). Despite this, there was no significant change in median LOS (2.7 days [IQR 1.11-5.73] vs 2.5, [IQR 1.16-6.14]; p=0.54). There was also a significant improvement in SAT (66.8% vs. 73.6%; p=<0.01) and SBT rates (90.3% vs. 94.6%; p=<0.01; Figure 1). Conclusions: Adoption of a closed unit model resulted in a statistically significant improvement in CICU mortality and daily SAT and SBT compliance, although surprisingly there was no improvement in LOS. These findings suggest that our transition to a closed unit model enhanced our patient's outcomes likely through promoting improved adherence to evidence-based critical care principles. Further study is needed to explore the factors contributing to the unchanged LOS and to better evaluate the long-term impact of a closed unit model on outcomes and resource utilization in cardiac ICUs.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.