Abstract 4142470: Clinical management of select patients with surgically implanted Impella 5.5 left ventricular assist devices on a cardiovascular step-down unit
Introduction: Surgically implanted Impella 5.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device utilization is increasing. Most centers manage Impella 5.5 patients exclusively in the ICU; however, there are concerns regarding prolonged ICU bed utilization in clinically stable patients. This study evaluates our experience managing Impella 5.5 patients in a stepdown unit (SDU). Methods: In January 2023, select patients with Impella 5.5 at our institution were admitted to a SDU after ≥24 hours in the ICU post implant. Eligible patients had no significant bleeding, device issues, or ongoing hypoperfusion. Demographics, hemodynamics, outcomes, and adverse events ( Fig ) were collected retrospectively and adjudicated by multidisciplinary clinician review. Results: Between Jan 1, 2023 and Mar 31, 2024, a total of 64 patients with Impella 5.5 were managed at our institution. Of these, 42 (66%) were managed in SDU for a median (IQR) of 11 (7, 21) days (range 1-82), totaling 733 of 1055 (69%) Impella-days. SDU patients with Impella 5.5 had a median age of 60 (50, 63) years, were mostly male (55%), non-ischemic (79%), and presented with Stage C (52%) or D (43%) shock. Impella strategy in SDU patients was bridge to transplant in 60% (n=25), to decision in 31% (n=13), to durable LVAD in 8% (n=3), and for VT ablation support in 1% (n=1). Five (12%) patients required transfer back to the ICU for escalation of care. Impella 5.5 patients on SDU experienced a total of 28 adverse events (0.027 events per Impella-day), with >1 adverse event in 16/42 (38%) patients ( Fig ). Twenty-eight (67%) SDU patients underwent heart transplant and 10 (24%) underwent LVAD implant during the hospitalization. One patient died during their hospital course, in whom care was withdrawn due to lack of a destination option. Conclusions: For select patients with Impella 5.5 who met institutional criteria, transfer to a SDU was feasible and safe. This strategy may increase ICU throughput and optimize resource allocation.
Authors
- Jeffrey McMurray
- Jessica Atkins (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6694-5088)
- Anthony Carnicelli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9805-4562)
- Adrian Van Bakel
- Jeffrey P. Yourshaw
- Jan M. Griffin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1729-7464)
- Lucas Witer
- Brian A. Houston (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6188-8072)
- Ryan J. Tedford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9045-7722)
- Gregory R. Jackson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-4939)
- Chakradhari Inampudi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2940-6330)
- Vishal N. Rao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3545-4267)
- Arman Kilic (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8112-8345)
- Muhammad Summer (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2609-520X)
- Krishna Bhandari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7531-6614)
- Lindsey Bull
- Meg Ospina
- Jennifer Hajj
- Kaylen Dodson
Institutions
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142470
- Primary Topic
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00