Abstract 4142470: Clinical management of select patients with surgically implanted Impella 5.5 left ventricular assist devices on a cardiovascular step-down unit

Introduction: Surgically implanted Impella 5.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device utilization is increasing. Most centers manage Impella 5.5 patients exclusively in the ICU; however, there are concerns regarding prolonged ICU bed utilization in clinically stable patients. This study evaluates our experience managing Impella 5.5 patients in a stepdown unit (SDU). Methods: In January 2023, select patients with Impella 5.5 at our institution were admitted to a SDU after ≥24 hours in the ICU post implant. Eligible patients had no significant bleeding, device issues, or ongoing hypoperfusion. Demographics, hemodynamics, outcomes, and adverse events ( Fig ) were collected retrospectively and adjudicated by multidisciplinary clinician review. Results: Between Jan 1, 2023 and Mar 31, 2024, a total of 64 patients with Impella 5.5 were managed at our institution. Of these, 42 (66%) were managed in SDU for a median (IQR) of 11 (7, 21) days (range 1-82), totaling 733 of 1055 (69%) Impella-days. SDU patients with Impella 5.5 had a median age of 60 (50, 63) years, were mostly male (55%), non-ischemic (79%), and presented with Stage C (52%) or D (43%) shock. Impella strategy in SDU patients was bridge to transplant in 60% (n=25), to decision in 31% (n=13), to durable LVAD in 8% (n=3), and for VT ablation support in 1% (n=1). Five (12%) patients required transfer back to the ICU for escalation of care. Impella 5.5 patients on SDU experienced a total of 28 adverse events (0.027 events per Impella-day), with >1 adverse event in 16/42 (38%) patients ( Fig ). Twenty-eight (67%) SDU patients underwent heart transplant and 10 (24%) underwent LVAD implant during the hospitalization. One patient died during their hospital course, in whom care was withdrawn due to lack of a destination option. Conclusions: For select patients with Impella 5.5 who met institutional criteria, transfer to a SDU was feasible and safe. This strategy may increase ICU throughput and optimize resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142470
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4142470: Clinical management of select patients with surgically implanted Impella 5.5 left ventricular assist devices on a cardiovascular step-down unit

Jeffrey McMurray, Jessica Atkins, Anthony Carnicelli, Adrian Van Bakel et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4142470: Clinical management of select patients with surgically implanted Impella 5.5 left ventricular assist devices on a cardiovascular step-down unit

Jeffrey McMurray, Jessica Atkins, Anthony Carnicelli, Adrian Van Bakel, Jeffrey P. Yourshaw, Jan M. Griffin, Lucas Witer, Brian A. Houston, Ryan J. Tedford, Gregory R. Jackson, Chakradhari Inampudi, Vishal N. Rao, Arman Kilic, Muhammad Summer, Krishna Bhandari, Lindsey Bull, Meg Ospina, Jennifer Hajj, Kaylen Dodson
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Surgically implanted Impella 5.5 percutaneous left ventricular assist device utilization is increasing. Most centers manage Impella 5.5 patients exclusively in the ICU; however, there are concerns regarding prolonged ICU bed utilization in clinically stable patients. This study evaluates our experience managing Impella 5.5 patients in a stepdown unit (SDU). Methods: In January 2023, select patients with Impella 5.5 at our institution were admitted to a SDU after ≥24 hours in the ICU post implant. Eligible patients had no significant bleeding, device issues, or ongoing hypoperfusion. Demographics, hemodynamics, outcomes, and adverse events ( Fig ) were collected retrospectively and adjudicated by multidisciplinary clinician review. Results: Between Jan 1, 2023 and Mar 31, 2024, a total of 64 patients with Impella 5.5 were managed at our institution. Of these, 42 (66%) were managed in SDU for a median (IQR) of 11 (7, 21) days (range 1-82), totaling 733 of 1055 (69%) Impella-days. SDU patients with Impella 5.5 had a median age of 60 (50, 63) years, were mostly male (55%), non-ischemic (79%), and presented with Stage C (52%) or D (43%) shock. Impella strategy in SDU patients was bridge to transplant in 60% (n=25), to decision in 31% (n=13), to durable LVAD in 8% (n=3), and for VT ablation support in 1% (n=1). Five (12%) patients required transfer back to the ICU for escalation of care. Impella 5.5 patients on SDU experienced a total of 28 adverse events (0.027 events per Impella-day), with >1 adverse event in 16/42 (38%) patients ( Fig ). Twenty-eight (67%) SDU patients underwent heart transplant and 10 (24%) underwent LVAD implant during the hospitalization. One patient died during their hospital course, in whom care was withdrawn due to lack of a destination option. Conclusions: For select patients with Impella 5.5 who met institutional criteria, transfer to a SDU was feasible and safe. This strategy may increase ICU throughput and optimize resource allocation.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.