Abstract 4142376: Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Limited data indicate an elevated risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer however the role of AF as an independent predictor of outcomes post-esophagectomy remains under-studied. We sought to the impact of AF on overall outcomes of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy, with or without adjuvant nivolumab. The global TriNetX database was used to identify patients (based on ICD-10 codes) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel and subsequently underwent esophagectomy between 2009 and 2024. Patients who received adjuvant nivolumab were analyzed separately. Patients who developed AF were compared with patients who did not using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, race, BMI, and multiple comorbidities. Outcomes over a 5-year period were mortality, ischemic stroke, and use of anticoagulation. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were generated with generalized linear mixed modeling and a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 1007 patients were identified, of these 186 (18.5%) developed AF after esophagectomy. PSM yielded 94 pairs for patients without adjuvant nivolumab. In this group, mortality was not significantly higher in patients with AF [OR=1.409 (0.793-2.504), p=0.242]. Incidence of stroke was equivalent between patients with and without AF [OR=1 (0.396-2.528), p = 1], despite significantly higher use of anticoagulation in the AF group [OR= 2.004 (1.071-3.749), p<0.028]. PSM for patients receiving adjuvant nivolumab yielded 68 pairs. In this cohort, AF was not associated with a significant difference in mortality [1.86 (0.843, 3.870), p = 0.126]. Incidence of stroke was significantly higher in patients with AF [Risk difference = 0.147 (0.063, 0.231) p = 0.0001], however anticoagulation use was not significantly higher in the AF group [1.944 (0.862, 4.384), p = 0.106]. The current analysis highlights a high incidence of AF after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. However, despite rigorous vetting with PSM, we found no difference in mortality associated with AF both among patients who received or did not receive adjuvant nivolumab. Diligent use of anticoagulation is required among patients with AF post-esophagectomy due to an increased risk of stroke. These findings merit confirmation in a large prospective cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142376
Primary Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4142376: Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Udhayvir Singh Grewal, Aravinthasamy Sivamurugan
Circulation
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
article

Abstract 4142376: Impact of Atrial Fibrillation on Outcomes in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Udhayvir Singh Grewal, Aravinthasamy Sivamurugan
article en

Abstract

Limited data indicate an elevated risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer however the role of AF as an independent predictor of outcomes post-esophagectomy remains under-studied. We sought to the impact of AF on overall outcomes of patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy, with or without adjuvant nivolumab. The global TriNetX database was used to identify patients (based on ICD-10 codes) with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel and subsequently underwent esophagectomy between 2009 and 2024. Patients who received adjuvant nivolumab were analyzed separately. Patients who developed AF were compared with patients who did not using propensity score matching (PSM) based on age, race, BMI, and multiple comorbidities. Outcomes over a 5-year period were mortality, ischemic stroke, and use of anticoagulation. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were generated with generalized linear mixed modeling and a p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. A total of 1007 patients were identified, of these 186 (18.5%) developed AF after esophagectomy. PSM yielded 94 pairs for patients without adjuvant nivolumab. In this group, mortality was not significantly higher in patients with AF [OR=1.409 (0.793-2.504), p=0.242]. Incidence of stroke was equivalent between patients with and without AF [OR=1 (0.396-2.528), p = 1], despite significantly higher use of anticoagulation in the AF group [OR= 2.004 (1.071-3.749), p<0.028]. PSM for patients receiving adjuvant nivolumab yielded 68 pairs. In this cohort, AF was not associated with a significant difference in mortality [1.86 (0.843, 3.870), p = 0.126]. Incidence of stroke was significantly higher in patients with AF [Risk difference = 0.147 (0.063, 0.231) p = 0.0001], however anticoagulation use was not significantly higher in the AF group [1.944 (0.862, 4.384), p = 0.106]. The current analysis highlights a high incidence of AF after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer. However, despite rigorous vetting with PSM, we found no difference in mortality associated with AF both among patients who received or did not receive adjuvant nivolumab. Diligent use of anticoagulation is required among patients with AF post-esophagectomy due to an increased risk of stroke. These findings merit confirmation in a large prospective cohort.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Iowa (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.