Abstract 4142305: Demand Ischemia Predicts Worse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Nonocclusive Coronary Disease Admitted for Nonsevere Sepsis

Background: Demand ischemia is typically ascribed little importance but likely indicates an elevated cardiovascular risk that is more significant than current convention dictates, despite the absence of plaque rupture. Hypothesis: Demand ischemia likely predicts worse 3-month cardiovascular outcomes in patients with nonocclusive CAD admitted for nonsevere sepsis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Readmissions Database 2017 to 2020 to evaluate whether demand ischemia predicts increased risk of 3-month readmission with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with nonocclusive CAD admitted for nonsevere sepsis. The outcomes of interest were 3-month readmissions with acute heart failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, STEMI, acute respiratory failure, AKI and vasopressor use. Multivariate analysis was employed to derive adjusted odds ratios (OR) after accounting for age, Charlson comorbidity index, household income, hospital location and size, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, CHF, atrial fibrillation/flutter, CKD, tobacco use, anemia, malnutrition, obesity, OSA and OHS. Results: Among patients with nonocclusive CAD admitted for nonsevere sepsis, 717,110 did not have demand ischemia, compared to 25,728 patients who did. In patients with demand ischemia, our results showed significantly increased risk of 3-month readmission with acute heart failure (OR 2.10, P < 0.0005, CI 2.00 – 2.19), ventricular tachyarrhythmia (OR 2.51, P < 0.0500, CI 1.19 – 5.34), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.66, P < 0.0005, CI 1.45 - 1.90), acute respiratory failure (OR 1.97, P < 0.0005, CI 1.89 – 2.05), AKI (OR 1.48, P < 0.0005, CI 1.42 – 1.54) and vasopressor use (OR 1.52, P < 0.0005, CI 1.31 – 1.78) There were no cases of 3-month readmissions with STEMI, possibly due to coding. Conclusion: Our results indicate that despite being considered a relatively benign diagnosis, demand ischemia is likely actually a marker for meaningfully elevated cardiovascular risk. Further studies will be needed to support this idea and to identify interventions that mitigate the risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4142305
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4142305: Demand Ischemia Predicts Worse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Nonocclusive Coronary Disease Admitted for Nonsevere Sepsis

Mariam Khabsa, Raj Desai, Gabriel Alugba, OLUWAFUNMBI FATUNMBI et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4142305: Demand Ischemia Predicts Worse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Nonocclusive Coronary Disease Admitted for Nonsevere Sepsis

Mariam Khabsa, Raj Desai, Gabriel Alugba, OLUWAFUNMBI FATUNMBI, Folake O. Ishola, Chidubem Ezenna, Ahmad Harb, Boluwaduro Abasiekem Adeyemi
article en

Abstract

Background: Demand ischemia is typically ascribed little importance but likely indicates an elevated cardiovascular risk that is more significant than current convention dictates, despite the absence of plaque rupture. Hypothesis: Demand ischemia likely predicts worse 3-month cardiovascular outcomes in patients with nonocclusive CAD admitted for nonsevere sepsis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from the National Readmissions Database 2017 to 2020 to evaluate whether demand ischemia predicts increased risk of 3-month readmission with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in patients with nonocclusive CAD admitted for nonsevere sepsis. The outcomes of interest were 3-month readmissions with acute heart failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, STEMI, acute respiratory failure, AKI and vasopressor use. Multivariate analysis was employed to derive adjusted odds ratios (OR) after accounting for age, Charlson comorbidity index, household income, hospital location and size, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, CHF, atrial fibrillation/flutter, CKD, tobacco use, anemia, malnutrition, obesity, OSA and OHS. Results: Among patients with nonocclusive CAD admitted for nonsevere sepsis, 717,110 did not have demand ischemia, compared to 25,728 patients who did. In patients with demand ischemia, our results showed significantly increased risk of 3-month readmission with acute heart failure (OR 2.10, P < 0.0005, CI 2.00 – 2.19), ventricular tachyarrhythmia (OR 2.51, P < 0.0500, CI 1.19 – 5.34), cardiogenic shock (OR 1.66, P < 0.0005, CI 1.45 - 1.90), acute respiratory failure (OR 1.97, P < 0.0005, CI 1.89 – 2.05), AKI (OR 1.48, P < 0.0005, CI 1.42 – 1.54) and vasopressor use (OR 1.52, P < 0.0005, CI 1.31 – 1.78) There were no cases of 3-month readmissions with STEMI, possibly due to coding. Conclusion: Our results indicate that despite being considered a relatively benign diagnosis, demand ischemia is likely actually a marker for meaningfully elevated cardiovascular risk. Further studies will be needed to support this idea and to identify interventions that mitigate the risk.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Medical University of Lublin (PL), Baystate Medical Center (US), Englewood Hospital and Medical Center (US), St. Vincent Hospital (US), Northwestern Medicine (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.