Abstract 4143176: Association Between Frailty Testing through Gait Speed and Mortality in CRT Patients: Report for a Multidisciplinary CRT Clinic

Background: Identifying predictors of mortality in CRT patients remains an active area of investigation. Objective: To establish a relationship between gait speed (GS) and mortality in heart failure patients with CRT. Hypothesis: Patients with slower gait speeds have worse survival rates after CRT implantation. Methods: This retrospective study included 504 patients who underwent CRT implantation at our institution between 2017-2022. All patients were followed up with a multidisciplinary team, including electrophysiology and heart failure physicians about 6 months after CRT implantation, where frailty was assessed. We used GS as a measure of frailty and divided patients into 2 groups: GS: <1 m/s (n=177) and ≥ 1 m/s (n=327). The primary endpoint was a composite of left ventricular assist device implantation, transplant, or death at 2 years post-CRT. Data was collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. Results: The study population was 65.7% male, with a mean age of 69.1 years, with majority of the devices being CRT-D (79.6%). Response was defined as an improvement in LVEF >5% with reduction in LVESV>10%; anybody not meeting this definition was classified as a non-responder. Responder and non-responder rates among GS< 1 m/s and GS > 1 m/s were 53.8% vs 66.4%; and 35.1% vs 26.2%, respectively. The median (IQR) GS was 1.15 m/s (0.91-1.37 m/s). 52 (10.3%) patients had a composite outcome within 2 years follow up. Non-parametric univariate analysis revealed that lower GS was significantly associated higher composite outcome rates (median GS 0.8 vs 1.18 m/s; p<0.001). Multivariate cox regression also revealed GS<1 m/s to be an independent predictor of our composite outcome [HR- 4.33 (2.20-8.86); p<0.001] (Table 1), with survival graphs showing patients with GS<1m/s having worse 2-year survival (Figure 1). Conclusion: Frailty testing using GS post-CRT implantation is a strong predictor of mortality in CRT patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143176
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4143176: Association Between Frailty Testing through Gait Speed and Mortality in CRT Patients: Report for a Multidisciplinary CRT Clinic

Aritra Paul, W.H. Wilson Tang, Niraj Varma, Arshneel Kochar et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4143176: Association Between Frailty Testing through Gait Speed and Mortality in CRT Patients: Report for a Multidisciplinary CRT Clinic

Aritra Paul, W.H. Wilson Tang, Niraj Varma, Arshneel Kochar, Oussama M. Wazni, Feras Bader, John Rickard, Joe Demian, J. Emanuel Finet
article en

Abstract

Background: Identifying predictors of mortality in CRT patients remains an active area of investigation. Objective: To establish a relationship between gait speed (GS) and mortality in heart failure patients with CRT. Hypothesis: Patients with slower gait speeds have worse survival rates after CRT implantation. Methods: This retrospective study included 504 patients who underwent CRT implantation at our institution between 2017-2022. All patients were followed up with a multidisciplinary team, including electrophysiology and heart failure physicians about 6 months after CRT implantation, where frailty was assessed. We used GS as a measure of frailty and divided patients into 2 groups: GS: <1 m/s (n=177) and ≥ 1 m/s (n=327). The primary endpoint was a composite of left ventricular assist device implantation, transplant, or death at 2 years post-CRT. Data was collected retrospectively from electronic medical records. Results: The study population was 65.7% male, with a mean age of 69.1 years, with majority of the devices being CRT-D (79.6%). Response was defined as an improvement in LVEF >5% with reduction in LVESV>10%; anybody not meeting this definition was classified as a non-responder. Responder and non-responder rates among GS< 1 m/s and GS > 1 m/s were 53.8% vs 66.4%; and 35.1% vs 26.2%, respectively. The median (IQR) GS was 1.15 m/s (0.91-1.37 m/s). 52 (10.3%) patients had a composite outcome within 2 years follow up. Non-parametric univariate analysis revealed that lower GS was significantly associated higher composite outcome rates (median GS 0.8 vs 1.18 m/s; p<0.001). Multivariate cox regression also revealed GS<1 m/s to be an independent predictor of our composite outcome [HR- 4.33 (2.20-8.86); p<0.001] (Table 1), with survival graphs showing patients with GS<1m/s having worse 2-year survival (Figure 1). Conclusion: Frailty testing using GS post-CRT implantation is a strong predictor of mortality in CRT patients.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.