Abstract 4143638: Donation After Circulatory Death in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: A Lost Opportunity for Donor Pool Expansion

Background: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is underutilized in pediatric heart transplant (HTx). Methods: UNOS database was analyzed for HTx with reported DCD donors (1/2020-4/2024). Data is reported as median (interquartile range). Multiorgan and retransplant recipients were excluded from outcome analysis. Results: The youngest DCD heart donor was <1 year old and the median age was 15 years. During the study period, 86 (4%) pediatric donors were DCD. However, in terms of pediatric recipients, DCD accounted for only 12 (0.9%) of the total pediatric HTx. The remaining pediatric DCD donors (74) were assigned to adult recipients. In the same period, all DCD donors accounted for 10% of adult HTx. The pediatric donor cohort was subdivided into 4 categories based on the recipient's age-group and whether the donor was DCD or not (table 1). Pediatric DCD hearts were allocated to lower priority listed recipients and those with blood group O (in both pediatric and adult recipients). Despite this, the total waitlist time was shorter among DCD recipients, suggesting the potential role of DCD to lower wait times. Distance travelled between donor to transplant center can be longer with DCD due to the use of a different organ care system. Table 1 summarizes the findings. Few UNOS regions (4, 5, 10, 11) are using pediatric DCD hearts for pediatric recipients (figure A). For outcome analysis, adult recipients who received pediatric DCD hearts were compared to those who received pediatric non-DCD hearts. No difference was noted in the one-year survival (figure B). Conclusion: Pediatric DCD heart for pediatric recipients represents an unexplored strategy for donor pool expansion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143638
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4143638: Donation After Circulatory Death in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: A Lost Opportunity for Donor Pool Expansion

Gaurang Vaidya, Mark Cocalis, Liliam Aquino, Anuja Shikhare et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4143638: Donation After Circulatory Death in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: A Lost Opportunity for Donor Pool Expansion

Gaurang Vaidya, Mark Cocalis, Liliam Aquino, Anuja Shikhare, Othman A. Aljohani
article en

Abstract

Background: Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is underutilized in pediatric heart transplant (HTx). Methods: UNOS database was analyzed for HTx with reported DCD donors (1/2020-4/2024). Data is reported as median (interquartile range). Multiorgan and retransplant recipients were excluded from outcome analysis. Results: The youngest DCD heart donor was <1 year old and the median age was 15 years. During the study period, 86 (4%) pediatric donors were DCD. However, in terms of pediatric recipients, DCD accounted for only 12 (0.9%) of the total pediatric HTx. The remaining pediatric DCD donors (74) were assigned to adult recipients. In the same period, all DCD donors accounted for 10% of adult HTx. The pediatric donor cohort was subdivided into 4 categories based on the recipient's age-group and whether the donor was DCD or not (table 1). Pediatric DCD hearts were allocated to lower priority listed recipients and those with blood group O (in both pediatric and adult recipients). Despite this, the total waitlist time was shorter among DCD recipients, suggesting the potential role of DCD to lower wait times. Distance travelled between donor to transplant center can be longer with DCD due to the use of a different organ care system. Table 1 summarizes the findings. Few UNOS regions (4, 5, 10, 11) are using pediatric DCD hearts for pediatric recipients (figure A). For outcome analysis, adult recipients who received pediatric DCD hearts were compared to those who received pediatric non-DCD hearts. No difference was noted in the one-year survival (figure B). Conclusion: Pediatric DCD heart for pediatric recipients represents an unexplored strategy for donor pool expansion.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of California, San Francisco (US), Kaiser Permanente Santa Clara Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.