Abstract 4143465: Aortic Root Pressure for Detecting Aortic Stenosis using Machine Learning

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive, deteriorative valvular condition that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The best method to diagnose the severity of AS is controversial as all of the current modalities have multiple potential sources of error. As severity of AS increases, the time from aortic valve opening to peak systolic pressure increases. We hypothesized that machine learning applied to pressure measured in the aortic root via a fluid filled catheter at the time of cardiac catheterization would accurately diagnose aortic stenosis. Aims: Use a long-short term memory (LSTM) neural network to identify AS using aortic root pressure. Methods: We assessed aortic root pressure recordings in 102 consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at our institution between 2014 and 2017. A LSTM was trained, validated, and tested using pre- and post- TAVR aortic root pressure 1 Hz digital recordings of 3.5 seconds duration. Recordings were selected to be artifact-free and in sinus rhythm. A 10-fold cross-validation structure was used (170 training, 17 validation, 17 testing tracings). The model was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and F1 score. Results: The LSTM was able to distinguish between pre-TAVR (severe AS) and post-TAVR (no AS) tracings with sensitivity of 0.764, specificity of 0.703, AUROC of 0.792, and F1 score of 0.741. In comparison, when pressure tracings of the left ventricle were added to the model, the LSTM performance improved to sensitivity of 0.956, specificity of 0.950, AUROC of 0.977, and F1 score of 0.954. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that aortic pressure alone can be used to detect severe AS. A larger analysis is needed to validate these findings across gradients of severity. This study has implications for using automatic AS severity assessments during cardiac catheterization to accurately diagnose AS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143465
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4143465: Aortic Root Pressure for Detecting Aortic Stenosis using Machine Learning

Michael Dunn, Sterling A. Wheaten, Faisal F. Syed, David S. Lalush et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Abstract 4143465: Aortic Root Pressure for Detecting Aortic Stenosis using Machine Learning

Michael Dunn, Sterling A. Wheaten, Faisal F. Syed, David S. Lalush, George A. Stouffer
article en

Abstract

Background: Aortic stenosis (AS) is a progressive, deteriorative valvular condition that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The best method to diagnose the severity of AS is controversial as all of the current modalities have multiple potential sources of error. As severity of AS increases, the time from aortic valve opening to peak systolic pressure increases. We hypothesized that machine learning applied to pressure measured in the aortic root via a fluid filled catheter at the time of cardiac catheterization would accurately diagnose aortic stenosis. Aims: Use a long-short term memory (LSTM) neural network to identify AS using aortic root pressure. Methods: We assessed aortic root pressure recordings in 102 consecutive patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) at our institution between 2014 and 2017. A LSTM was trained, validated, and tested using pre- and post- TAVR aortic root pressure 1 Hz digital recordings of 3.5 seconds duration. Recordings were selected to be artifact-free and in sinus rhythm. A 10-fold cross-validation structure was used (170 training, 17 validation, 17 testing tracings). The model was assessed using area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and F1 score. Results: The LSTM was able to distinguish between pre-TAVR (severe AS) and post-TAVR (no AS) tracings with sensitivity of 0.764, specificity of 0.703, AUROC of 0.792, and F1 score of 0.741. In comparison, when pressure tracings of the left ventricle were added to the model, the LSTM performance improved to sensitivity of 0.956, specificity of 0.950, AUROC of 0.977, and F1 score of 0.954. Conclusion: This proof-of-concept study demonstrated that aortic pressure alone can be used to detect severe AS. A larger analysis is needed to validate these findings across gradients of severity. This study has implications for using automatic AS severity assessments during cardiac catheterization to accurately diagnose AS.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), North Carolina State University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.