Abstract 4143677: Derivation and internal validation of a nomogram for bleeding risk prediction in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Background: Standard scoring system for bleeding risk assessment has not been developed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aims to develop a practical nomogram for bleeding risk evaluation in patients with AF and ACS or undergoing PCI who received both oral anticoagulant (OAC) and antiplatelet therapy (APT). Methods: A total of 930 patients with AF and ACS/PCI receiving both OAC and APT were consecutively recruited and followed up for 1 year. The primary endpoint was defined according to the bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) criteria as major bleeding (BARC 3a, 3b, 3c, and 5). Potential prognostic variables of the primary endpoint were selected by the LASSO method and incorporated in a multivariable logistic regression model. A nomogram visualizing the logistic regression model was then generated. Discrimination was evaluated and compared by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and c-indexes. Calibration was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, Brier scores and calibration plots. Results: During 1-year follow-up, BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 36 patients (3.9%). Four key predictors of the primary endpoint (previous bleeding history, hemoglobin, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, and left atrial diameter) were selected by the LASSO method and integrated to construct a nomogram for bleeding risk prediction. This nomogram displayed good discrimination with a c-index of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.639-0.841). Bootstrap resampling was undertaken for internal validation and the bias-corrected c-index was 0.726. Compared to the HAS-BLED score, the nomogram displayed a significant improvement in bleeding risk prediction (c-statistics: 0.740 vs. 0.575, p<0.001). According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the Brier score, the calibration of this nomogram was good. Conclusion: In patients with AF and ACS or undergoing PCI who received both OAC and APT, a simple 4-variable nomogram provide a practical tool for 1-year BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding prediction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143677
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4143677: Derivation and internal validation of a nomogram for bleeding risk prediction in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Yanmin Yang, Si‐qi Lyu, Jun Zhu
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4143677: Derivation and internal validation of a nomogram for bleeding risk prediction in patients with atrial fibrillation and acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Yanmin Yang, Si‐qi Lyu, Jun Zhu
article en

Abstract

Background: Standard scoring system for bleeding risk assessment has not been developed in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aims to develop a practical nomogram for bleeding risk evaluation in patients with AF and ACS or undergoing PCI who received both oral anticoagulant (OAC) and antiplatelet therapy (APT). Methods: A total of 930 patients with AF and ACS/PCI receiving both OAC and APT were consecutively recruited and followed up for 1 year. The primary endpoint was defined according to the bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) criteria as major bleeding (BARC 3a, 3b, 3c, and 5). Potential prognostic variables of the primary endpoint were selected by the LASSO method and incorporated in a multivariable logistic regression model. A nomogram visualizing the logistic regression model was then generated. Discrimination was evaluated and compared by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and c-indexes. Calibration was assessed by the Hosmer-Lemeshow tests, Brier scores and calibration plots. Results: During 1-year follow-up, BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding occurred in 36 patients (3.9%). Four key predictors of the primary endpoint (previous bleeding history, hemoglobin, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, and left atrial diameter) were selected by the LASSO method and integrated to construct a nomogram for bleeding risk prediction. This nomogram displayed good discrimination with a c-index of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.639-0.841). Bootstrap resampling was undertaken for internal validation and the bias-corrected c-index was 0.726. Compared to the HAS-BLED score, the nomogram displayed a significant improvement in bleeding risk prediction (c-statistics: 0.740 vs. 0.575, p<0.001). According to the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and the Brier score, the calibration of this nomogram was good. Conclusion: In patients with AF and ACS or undergoing PCI who received both OAC and APT, a simple 4-variable nomogram provide a practical tool for 1-year BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding prediction.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.