Abstract 4144056: Quantitative Testing Reveals Severity of Autonomic Dysfunction after Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Comparison with Controls and Autonomic Failure

Background: COVID-19 infections have been associated with cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction (AD). Clinical findings include fatigue, cognitive impairment, and postural intolerance. However, quantitative post-COVID AD assessments are lacking. Objective: Compare autonomic testing measures of post-COVID-19 subjects to controls and those with pure autonomic failure (PAF). Methods: Autonomic testing included 1) change in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) with active standing (AS) and tilt table testing (TT), 2) time to BP nadir and recovery during AS and TT, 3) Valsalva ratio (VR), and 4) respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Comparisons between two groups were made using t-tests, Kruskal-Wallis, or chi-square tests. Multivariable linear regression was used to adjust findings for age and sex. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Control subjects (n=25, median 32 [21-39] years, 76% female) and post-COVID patients (n=91, median 36 [25-50] years, 84% female, mean 11.96 [±9.14] months from infection) were similar in age and sex, while the PAF group (n=38, median 64 [56-74] years, 53% female) was older and comprised of more males (Table 1). The VR and RSA of the post-COVID group was significantly lower than controls, but higher than the PAF group (Table 2). The change in BP with AS and TT for post-COVID subjects was significantly higher than controls and lower than the PAF group. The post-COVID group also had a significantly increased change in HR with TT compared to both the control and PAF groups. Across all four tests, the post-COVID group had a higher proportion of abnormal results compared to controls. After adjusting for age and sex, post-COVID subjects continued to have a greater change in HR and BP with AS and TT and a lower RSA compared to controls. However, with this adjustment several differences compared to the PAF group were attenuated (Table 3). Conclusion: Post-COVID subjects were observed to have multiple quantitative autonomic testing abnormalities. Once corrected for sex and age, AD severity in post-COVID-19 patients is comparable to that seen in neurodegenerative PAF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144056
Primary Topic
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144056: Quantitative Testing Reveals Severity of Autonomic Dysfunction after Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Comparison with Controls and Autonomic Failure

Sue Duval, Ciana Keller, David G. Benditt, Lorraine Mascarenhas
Circulation
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
article

Abstract 4144056: Quantitative Testing Reveals Severity of Autonomic Dysfunction after Acute COVID-19 Infection: A Comparison with Controls and Autonomic Failure

Sue Duval, Ciana Keller, David G. Benditt, Lorraine Mascarenhas
article en

Abstract

Background: COVID-19 infections have been associated with cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction (AD). Clinical findings include fatigue, cognitive impairment, and postural intolerance. However, quantitative post-COVID AD assessments are lacking. Objective: Compare autonomic testing measures of post-COVID-19 subjects to controls and those with pure autonomic failure (PAF). Methods: Autonomic testing included 1) change in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) with active standing (AS) and tilt table testing (TT), 2) time to BP nadir and recovery during AS and TT, 3) Valsalva ratio (VR), and 4) respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA). Comparisons between two groups were made using t-tests, Kruskal-Wallis, or chi-square tests. Multivariable linear regression was used to adjust findings for age and sex. A p-value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Control subjects (n=25, median 32 [21-39] years, 76% female) and post-COVID patients (n=91, median 36 [25-50] years, 84% female, mean 11.96 [±9.14] months from infection) were similar in age and sex, while the PAF group (n=38, median 64 [56-74] years, 53% female) was older and comprised of more males (Table 1). The VR and RSA of the post-COVID group was significantly lower than controls, but higher than the PAF group (Table 2). The change in BP with AS and TT for post-COVID subjects was significantly higher than controls and lower than the PAF group. The post-COVID group also had a significantly increased change in HR with TT compared to both the control and PAF groups. Across all four tests, the post-COVID group had a higher proportion of abnormal results compared to controls. After adjusting for age and sex, post-COVID subjects continued to have a greater change in HR and BP with AS and TT and a lower RSA compared to controls. However, with this adjustment several differences compared to the PAF group were attenuated (Table 3). Conclusion: Post-COVID subjects were observed to have multiple quantitative autonomic testing abnormalities. Once corrected for sex and age, AD severity in post-COVID-19 patients is comparable to that seen in neurodegenerative PAF.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Minnesota Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.