Abstract 4143907: Immediate versus staged percutaneous coronary intervention of non-culprit lesions in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of 4,120 patients.

Introduction: Multivessel coronary artery disease is common in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Previous trials have shown that comprehensive revascularization of non-culprit arteries with significant stenosis reduces the risks of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization compared to culprit-only revascularization. However, the optimal timing for revascularizing non-culprit lesions—immediate versus staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)—remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine if staged or immediate PCI is associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023485163). We included studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases until October 10, 2023. Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients over 18 with STEMI and hemodynamically stable multivessel disease; 2) intervention: immediate PCI; 3) comparator: staged PCI; 4) study types: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Study quality was assessed using ROBINS-I for observational studies and ROB 2 for RCTs. Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria: 3 RCTs and 6 cohort studies, with a total of 4,120 patients. Staged PCI was significantly associated with reduced cardiovascular death (RR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.11-2.81; p = 0.02, I 2 = 24%) and all-cause mortality (RR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.19-2.79; p = 0.005, I 2 = 42%). Hazard ratio analysis also favored staged PCI for cardiovascular death (HR = 4.11; 95% CI = 1.07-5.87; p = 0.04, I 2 = 12%) and all-cause mortality (HR = 8.13; 95% CI = 1.01-8.17; p = 0.05, I 2 = 37%). No significant differences were found for major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.74-1.28; p = 0.86, I 2 = 53%) or in major bleeding, stroke, or target vessel revascularization. Conclusion: In patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, staged coronary revascularization is associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality compared to immediate revascularization, without increasing adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4143907
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4143907: Immediate versus staged percutaneous coronary intervention of non-culprit lesions in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of 4,120 patients.

D. Martínez, Daniel Paulino, Lissette Haydee García-Mena, B Hernandez et al.
Circulation
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Abstract 4143907: Immediate versus staged percutaneous coronary intervention of non-culprit lesions in patients with st-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: a meta-analysis of 4,120 patients.

D. Martínez, Daniel Paulino, Lissette Haydee García-Mena, B Hernandez, Edwin Andrade Arbaiza, Shirley Xiloj
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Multivessel coronary artery disease is common in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Previous trials have shown that comprehensive revascularization of non-culprit arteries with significant stenosis reduces the risks of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization compared to culprit-only revascularization. However, the optimal timing for revascularizing non-culprit lesions—immediate versus staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)—remains unclear. This meta-analysis aims to determine if staged or immediate PCI is associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular events. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with a protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023485163). We included studies from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases until October 10, 2023. Inclusion criteria were: 1) patients over 18 with STEMI and hemodynamically stable multivessel disease; 2) intervention: immediate PCI; 3) comparator: staged PCI; 4) study types: randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies. Study quality was assessed using ROBINS-I for observational studies and ROB 2 for RCTs. Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria: 3 RCTs and 6 cohort studies, with a total of 4,120 patients. Staged PCI was significantly associated with reduced cardiovascular death (RR = 1.77; 95% CI = 1.11-2.81; p = 0.02, I 2 = 24%) and all-cause mortality (RR = 1.83; 95% CI = 1.19-2.79; p = 0.005, I 2 = 42%). Hazard ratio analysis also favored staged PCI for cardiovascular death (HR = 4.11; 95% CI = 1.07-5.87; p = 0.04, I 2 = 12%) and all-cause mortality (HR = 8.13; 95% CI = 1.01-8.17; p = 0.05, I 2 = 37%). No significant differences were found for major adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.74-1.28; p = 0.86, I 2 = 53%) or in major bleeding, stroke, or target vessel revascularization. Conclusion: In patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, staged coronary revascularization is associated with a lower risk of major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality compared to immediate revascularization, without increasing adverse outcomes. Further research is needed to confirm these findings.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala (GT), Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (MX), University of El Salvador (SV), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.