Abstract 4144001: Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and endothelial dysfunction. These disorders and other syndromes of angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) are increasingly recognized. However, the association between DM and non-CMD ANOCA endotypes, such as vasospastic angina (VA) and symptomatic myocardial bridging (MB), is not well defined. This study aims to report the findings of coronary function testing (CFT) in patients with DM and to determine the association between DM and specific ANOCA endotypes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography and CFT with intracoronary acetylcholine provocation and bolus thermodilution between January 2018 and May 2024. Data regarding patient demographics, medical history, and physiological measurements—including coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), fractional flow reserve (FFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and post-procedure diagnosis—were obtained. Results: 233 patients were included, 163 (70%) were female, with a mean age of 57 ± 11 years. Of the total cohort 52 patients (22.3%) had DM. Among patients with DM, 23 (44%) had CMD, 13 (25%) had VA, 6 (12%) had mixed CMD/VA, 11 (21%) had endothelial dysfunction, and 4 (7.7%) had other phenotypes such as elevated resting flow and MB. The median CFR was reduced in patients with DM compared to those without DM (2.6 vs. 3.45; p=0.001), and the median IMR was higher (28 vs. 19; p<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the median FFR (0.89 vs. 0.9; p=0.375) or median RFR (0.91 vs. 0.93; p=0.1). The risk of having any ANOCA diagnosis was comparable between patients with DM and those without DM (risk ratio = 1.03 [0.92, 1.15]; p=0.67), but patients with DM had a significantly increased risk of CMD compared to patients without DM (risk ratio = 1.82 [1.22, 2.71]; p=0.0052). No association was observed between DM and any other ANOCA endotypes. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed that DM is associated with lower CFR, higher IMR, and an increased risk of CMD. No association was found between DM and any other ANOCA endotype. These findings align with existing data using a contemporary, reproducible CFT protocol. Future studies will explore the clinical implications of these findings and evaluate the impact of glycemic control on outcomes in this patient population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144001
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144001: Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

Natalija Odanović, Natasha Cigarroa, Steffne Kunnirickal, Samit Shah et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Abstract 4144001: Association Between Diabetes Mellitus and Angina With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

Natalija Odanović, Natasha Cigarroa, Steffne Kunnirickal, Samit Shah, Nida Latif, Spyridon Kostantinis, Gabriel Garcia Castro
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a risk factor for coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and endothelial dysfunction. These disorders and other syndromes of angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) are increasingly recognized. However, the association between DM and non-CMD ANOCA endotypes, such as vasospastic angina (VA) and symptomatic myocardial bridging (MB), is not well defined. This study aims to report the findings of coronary function testing (CFT) in patients with DM and to determine the association between DM and specific ANOCA endotypes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of patients who underwent clinically indicated invasive coronary angiography and CFT with intracoronary acetylcholine provocation and bolus thermodilution between January 2018 and May 2024. Data regarding patient demographics, medical history, and physiological measurements—including coronary flow reserve (CFR), index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR), fractional flow reserve (FFR), resting full-cycle ratio (RFR), and post-procedure diagnosis—were obtained. Results: 233 patients were included, 163 (70%) were female, with a mean age of 57 ± 11 years. Of the total cohort 52 patients (22.3%) had DM. Among patients with DM, 23 (44%) had CMD, 13 (25%) had VA, 6 (12%) had mixed CMD/VA, 11 (21%) had endothelial dysfunction, and 4 (7.7%) had other phenotypes such as elevated resting flow and MB. The median CFR was reduced in patients with DM compared to those without DM (2.6 vs. 3.45; p=0.001), and the median IMR was higher (28 vs. 19; p<0.001). No statistically significant differences were found in the median FFR (0.89 vs. 0.9; p=0.375) or median RFR (0.91 vs. 0.93; p=0.1). The risk of having any ANOCA diagnosis was comparable between patients with DM and those without DM (risk ratio = 1.03 [0.92, 1.15]; p=0.67), but patients with DM had a significantly increased risk of CMD compared to patients without DM (risk ratio = 1.82 [1.22, 2.71]; p=0.0052). No association was observed between DM and any other ANOCA endotypes. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed that DM is associated with lower CFR, higher IMR, and an increased risk of CMD. No association was found between DM and any other ANOCA endotype. These findings align with existing data using a contemporary, reproducible CFT protocol. Future studies will explore the clinical implications of these findings and evaluate the impact of glycemic control on outcomes in this patient population.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Yale University (US), Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina (RS)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.