Abstract 4144673: 1-Year Outcomes After Cardioversion With and Without Anticoagulation in Patients With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative primary stroke prevention strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation (AC). Following LAAO implantation, patients typically undergo testing after 45 days to confirm successful occlusion and potentially discontinue AC. Some patients with LAAO may require cardioversion (CVN) due to recurrent AF. However, data is limited on whether post-CVN management in these patients should mirror that of patients without LAAO. Therefore, we report the outcomes of patients with LAAO who underwent CVN and were empirically treated with or without AC post-CVN. Methods: Using the TriNetX database, we identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who had LAAO, underwent CVN, and were not on AC prior to the procedure. Patients were included if they received AC for at least 4 weeks after CVN (AC group) or did not receive AC (Non-AC group). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders between the two groups. Thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes were assessed at 1 year post-CVN. Results: Among 1,086 patients, 84 (7.7%) received anticoagulation after CVN. After propensity score matching, 158 patients (79 in each group) were included, with a mean age of 71.8 ± 11.3 years (49% female) in the AC group and 70.6 ± 12.5 years (39% female) in the Non-AC group. At 1 year, the incidence of composite thromboembolic events was similar between the AC and Non-AC groups (12.7% vs. 12.7%; OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.39-2.55). Most thromboembolic events occurred within 2 weeks post-CVN. There were no significant differences in the composite outcomes of intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, or need for blood transfusion between the AC and Non-AC groups at 1 year (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.30-2.25). Conclusion: Data suggest that most patients with LAAO do not receive AC after CVN. Additionally, the use of anticoagulation post-CVN in patients with LAAO did not statistically reduce thromboembolic events nor increase bleeding risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144673
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144673: 1-Year Outcomes After Cardioversion With and Without Anticoagulation in Patients With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Leenhapong Navaravong, Samuel Mensah, Harshith Thyagaturu, Angkawipa Trongtorsak et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4144673: 1-Year Outcomes After Cardioversion With and Without Anticoagulation in Patients With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Leenhapong Navaravong, Samuel Mensah, Harshith Thyagaturu, Angkawipa Trongtorsak, Sittinun Thangjui, Jakrin Kewcharoen, Sudarshan Balla, HangYu Watson
article en

Abstract

Background: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is an alternative primary stroke prevention strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation (AC). Following LAAO implantation, patients typically undergo testing after 45 days to confirm successful occlusion and potentially discontinue AC. Some patients with LAAO may require cardioversion (CVN) due to recurrent AF. However, data is limited on whether post-CVN management in these patients should mirror that of patients without LAAO. Therefore, we report the outcomes of patients with LAAO who underwent CVN and were empirically treated with or without AC post-CVN. Methods: Using the TriNetX database, we identified patients aged ≥ 18 years who had LAAO, underwent CVN, and were not on AC prior to the procedure. Patients were included if they received AC for at least 4 weeks after CVN (AC group) or did not receive AC (Non-AC group). Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for confounders between the two groups. Thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes were assessed at 1 year post-CVN. Results: Among 1,086 patients, 84 (7.7%) received anticoagulation after CVN. After propensity score matching, 158 patients (79 in each group) were included, with a mean age of 71.8 ± 11.3 years (49% female) in the AC group and 70.6 ± 12.5 years (39% female) in the Non-AC group. At 1 year, the incidence of composite thromboembolic events was similar between the AC and Non-AC groups (12.7% vs. 12.7%; OR = 1.00, 95% CI: 0.39-2.55). Most thromboembolic events occurred within 2 weeks post-CVN. There were no significant differences in the composite outcomes of intracranial bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, or need for blood transfusion between the AC and Non-AC groups at 1 year (OR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.30-2.25). Conclusion: Data suggest that most patients with LAAO do not receive AC after CVN. Additionally, the use of anticoagulation post-CVN in patients with LAAO did not statistically reduce thromboembolic events nor increase bleeding risk.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
West Virginia University (US), Virginia Commonwealth University (US), University of Utah (US), Loma Linda University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.