Abstract 4144774: Machine Learning-Based Clinical Predictive Models for Early Readmission in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

Background/Purpose: Cardiogenic shock (CS) affects up to 50,000 people annually in the United States, with high in-hospital mortality rates of 40%-67%. About 18.6% of CS survivors are re-admitted. This study aims to predict 7-day and 30-day readmissions in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms to guide targeted interventions and improve healthcare outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study used the 2019 National Readmissions Database (NRD). CS hospitalizations were identified using ICD-10 code R57.0. Welch’s t-test compared continuous variables. The dataset was split into training and testing sets with a 7:3 ratio. Commonly used ML models, including XGBoost, Adaboost, decision tree, and random forest, were compared with logistic regression (LR). The primary outcome was CS readmission within 7 or 30 days of discharge. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for performance measurement. Results: Among 97,653 CS patients, 32,881 (33.7%) died during their initial hospitalization. Index hospitalizations were 51,976. We excluded hospitalizations where patients died during their initial stay, as these cases would not contribute to readmission data. Additionally, we only considered hospitalizations from January to November, excluding December hospitalizations since their 30-day readmissions would occur in the following year. The 7-day readmission rate was 4,317 (8.3%), and the 30-day readmission rate was 10,927 (21.02%). Significant predictors for both readmission periods (p value <0.05) included lower mean age, lower income, higher Medicaid coverage, lower private insurance coverage, higher rates of CKD3, chronic pulmonary disease, drug abuse, and diabetes with complications as shown in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the performance of various ML models, with XGBoost being the best model in both tasks, achieving an AUC of 0.65 for 7-day and 0.67 for 30-day readmissions, indicating less than a 70% chance of accurately predicting readmission. This performance was similar to that of LR (AUC of 0.61 and 0.67). Conclusion: ML models have poor capacity for early CR readmission prediction and perform similarly to logistic regression (LR) when developed using large administrative datasets. To enhance future model development, incorporating electronic health records (EHRs) with more detailed and clinically relevant data should be considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144774
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144774: Machine Learning-Based Clinical Predictive Models for Early Readmission in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

Xiarepati Tieliwaerdi, Kathryn Manalo, Abulikemu Abuduweili, Erasmus Mutabi et al.
Circulation
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Abstract 4144774: Machine Learning-Based Clinical Predictive Models for Early Readmission in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

Xiarepati Tieliwaerdi, Kathryn Manalo, Abulikemu Abuduweili, Erasmus Mutabi, Matthew Lander
article en

Abstract

Background/Purpose: Cardiogenic shock (CS) affects up to 50,000 people annually in the United States, with high in-hospital mortality rates of 40%-67%. About 18.6% of CS survivors are re-admitted. This study aims to predict 7-day and 30-day readmissions in CS patients using machine learning (ML) algorithms to guide targeted interventions and improve healthcare outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study used the 2019 National Readmissions Database (NRD). CS hospitalizations were identified using ICD-10 code R57.0. Welch’s t-test compared continuous variables. The dataset was split into training and testing sets with a 7:3 ratio. Commonly used ML models, including XGBoost, Adaboost, decision tree, and random forest, were compared with logistic regression (LR). The primary outcome was CS readmission within 7 or 30 days of discharge. The area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for performance measurement. Results: Among 97,653 CS patients, 32,881 (33.7%) died during their initial hospitalization. Index hospitalizations were 51,976. We excluded hospitalizations where patients died during their initial stay, as these cases would not contribute to readmission data. Additionally, we only considered hospitalizations from January to November, excluding December hospitalizations since their 30-day readmissions would occur in the following year. The 7-day readmission rate was 4,317 (8.3%), and the 30-day readmission rate was 10,927 (21.02%). Significant predictors for both readmission periods (p value <0.05) included lower mean age, lower income, higher Medicaid coverage, lower private insurance coverage, higher rates of CKD3, chronic pulmonary disease, drug abuse, and diabetes with complications as shown in Table 1. Figure 1 shows the performance of various ML models, with XGBoost being the best model in both tasks, achieving an AUC of 0.65 for 7-day and 0.67 for 30-day readmissions, indicating less than a 70% chance of accurately predicting readmission. This performance was similar to that of LR (AUC of 0.61 and 0.67). Conclusion: ML models have poor capacity for early CR readmission prediction and perform similarly to logistic regression (LR) when developed using large administrative datasets. To enhance future model development, incorporating electronic health records (EHRs) with more detailed and clinically relevant data should be considered.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Allegheny Health Network (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.