Abstract 4144353: Evaluating Electrocardiographic Predictors of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Decline after Conduction System Pacing: Using Time-to-notch in Lead I

Background: While conduction system pacing (CSP) has shown promise in mitigating the risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy compared to traditional right ventricular pacing, some patients undergoing CSP may experience declines in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aimed to identify ECG predictors of LVEF decline after left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) or deep septal pacing (DSP). Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing LBBAP or DSP at a single center who had baseline LVEF >35%, follow-up echocardiogram at least 90 days post-implant, >20% ventricular pacing, and no coronary intervention during follow-up were retrospectively studied. Post-implant ECGs were analyzed for LBBAP capture (delayed RV activation with RSR’ pattern in V 1 or QRS duration <120 msec) or DSP (all others), V6 R wave peak time (<75 msec if narrow QRS or RBBB, <85 msec if LBBB), lead I time to notch >75 msec, and RS/rS pattern in V6. Primary outcome was absolute LVEF decline ≥15%. Results: A total of 67 patients met inclusion criteria with mean age 73 years, 45% female, 63% African American, 34% CAD, 18% cardiomyopathy, and 60% median LVEF (IQR 52-68%) at baseline. LBBAP was achieved in 39 (58%) and DSP in 28 (42%). Median pacing at follow-up was 99% over median follow-up of 15.6 (IQR 8-23) months. No differences were noted with respect to demographics, clinical comorbidities, or LBBAP vs DSP among patients with and without LVEF decline ≥15% (Table). Among ECG predictors, notch time in Lead I >75 msec was significant on univariate logistic regression analysis (OR 4.431, 95% CI 1.11-17.72, p=0.035, Figure) and with multivariate adjustment for age, baseline LVEF, history of cardiomyopathy or CAD. Conclusion: Lead I notch time >75 msec on post-implant paced ECG was associated with LVEF decline at follow up, albeit with broad confidence intervals. These findings suggest utility in evaluating paced QRS patterns after CSP to identify patients at risk for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144353
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144353: Evaluating Electrocardiographic Predictors of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Decline after Conduction System Pacing: Using Time-to-notch in Lead I

Andrew D. Beaser, Srinath Yeshwant, Amulya Gampa, Jeremy S. Treger et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4144353: Evaluating Electrocardiographic Predictors of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Decline after Conduction System Pacing: Using Time-to-notch in Lead I

Andrew D. Beaser, Srinath Yeshwant, Amulya Gampa, Jeremy S. Treger, Gaurav A. Upadhyay, Zaid Aziz, Tommy Chiou, Cevher Özcan, Dipayon Roy
article en

Abstract

Background: While conduction system pacing (CSP) has shown promise in mitigating the risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy compared to traditional right ventricular pacing, some patients undergoing CSP may experience declines in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aimed to identify ECG predictors of LVEF decline after left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) or deep septal pacing (DSP). Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing LBBAP or DSP at a single center who had baseline LVEF >35%, follow-up echocardiogram at least 90 days post-implant, >20% ventricular pacing, and no coronary intervention during follow-up were retrospectively studied. Post-implant ECGs were analyzed for LBBAP capture (delayed RV activation with RSR’ pattern in V 1 or QRS duration <120 msec) or DSP (all others), V6 R wave peak time (<75 msec if narrow QRS or RBBB, <85 msec if LBBB), lead I time to notch >75 msec, and RS/rS pattern in V6. Primary outcome was absolute LVEF decline ≥15%. Results: A total of 67 patients met inclusion criteria with mean age 73 years, 45% female, 63% African American, 34% CAD, 18% cardiomyopathy, and 60% median LVEF (IQR 52-68%) at baseline. LBBAP was achieved in 39 (58%) and DSP in 28 (42%). Median pacing at follow-up was 99% over median follow-up of 15.6 (IQR 8-23) months. No differences were noted with respect to demographics, clinical comorbidities, or LBBAP vs DSP among patients with and without LVEF decline ≥15% (Table). Among ECG predictors, notch time in Lead I >75 msec was significant on univariate logistic regression analysis (OR 4.431, 95% CI 1.11-17.72, p=0.035, Figure) and with multivariate adjustment for age, baseline LVEF, history of cardiomyopathy or CAD. Conclusion: Lead I notch time >75 msec on post-implant paced ECG was associated with LVEF decline at follow up, albeit with broad confidence intervals. These findings suggest utility in evaluating paced QRS patterns after CSP to identify patients at risk for pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.