Abstract 4144475: Predictors of progression to left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with borderline left ventricular systolic function

Background: In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), borderline left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) was reported to be a significant risk factor for developing LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD), which is associated with poor prognosis. However, the natural history of patients with borderline LVEF and risk factors for progression to overt LVSD are incompletely characterized. Methods: HCM patients who had two or more echocardiography exams between 2005 and 2023 and a borderline LVEF of 50–59% on the initial exam were included. Patients who progressed to LVSD during follow-up were compared with patients with preserved LV systolic function. Results: Among 2,282 HCM patients evaluated, 145 patients (6.4%) with borderline LVEF at baseline were included (median age 61, IQR 51-72; male 67%). Compared to patients with normal LVEF (≥60%), patients with borderline LVEF had more atrial fibrillation (AF) (16% vs. 38%), less obstructive physiology (18% vs. 6.2%), larger left atrial (LA) size, and lower LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) (-16.1 vs. -13.7%) and LA reservoir strain (LARS) (27.7% vs. 21.7%) (all p<0.001). During median follow-up of 6.5 [IQR 3.2–10.9] years, 30 patients (21%) progressed to LVSD. Patients who progressed to LVSD were younger (55 vs. 64 years, p<0.001), had less hypertension, lower LVEF (55% vs. 57%, p<0.001), larger LV and LA dimensions, and higher ESC sudden cardiac death risk scores (2.1% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001) compared to patients with preserved LVEF. They also had lower baseline LARS (18.2% vs 22.6%, p=0.028) and LA contraction strain (9.3% vs. 12.2%, p=0.011), while there were no differences in LV-GLS and LA conduction strain. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of LVSD progression were identified as younger age (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.97, p=0.017, per 5 years), lower LVEF (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.91, p<0.001), larger LV end-diastolic dimension (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06–1.30, p=0.002), and lower LARS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89–0.98, p=0.011). Conclusions: Among HCM patients with borderline LVEF, 21% progressed to overt LVSD. Younger age, lower LVEF, larger LV size and lower LA strain at baseline predicted the development of LVSD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144475
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144475: Predictors of progression to left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with borderline left ventricular systolic function

Chi Young Shim, Iksung Cho, Geu‐Ru Hong, Seo‐Yeon Gwak et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
article

Abstract 4144475: Predictors of progression to left ventricular systolic dysfunction in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients with borderline left ventricular systolic function

Chi Young Shim, Iksung Cho, Geu‐Ru Hong, Seo‐Yeon Gwak, Sang‐Shin Park, Kyu Kim, Hyun‐Jung Lee, Jongwon Ha, Nurjanar Galimkhan
article en

Abstract

Background: In patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), borderline left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) was reported to be a significant risk factor for developing LV systolic dysfunction (LVSD), which is associated with poor prognosis. However, the natural history of patients with borderline LVEF and risk factors for progression to overt LVSD are incompletely characterized. Methods: HCM patients who had two or more echocardiography exams between 2005 and 2023 and a borderline LVEF of 50–59% on the initial exam were included. Patients who progressed to LVSD during follow-up were compared with patients with preserved LV systolic function. Results: Among 2,282 HCM patients evaluated, 145 patients (6.4%) with borderline LVEF at baseline were included (median age 61, IQR 51-72; male 67%). Compared to patients with normal LVEF (≥60%), patients with borderline LVEF had more atrial fibrillation (AF) (16% vs. 38%), less obstructive physiology (18% vs. 6.2%), larger left atrial (LA) size, and lower LV global longitudinal strain (LV-GLS) (-16.1 vs. -13.7%) and LA reservoir strain (LARS) (27.7% vs. 21.7%) (all p<0.001). During median follow-up of 6.5 [IQR 3.2–10.9] years, 30 patients (21%) progressed to LVSD. Patients who progressed to LVSD were younger (55 vs. 64 years, p<0.001), had less hypertension, lower LVEF (55% vs. 57%, p<0.001), larger LV and LA dimensions, and higher ESC sudden cardiac death risk scores (2.1% vs. 1.4%, p<0.001) compared to patients with preserved LVEF. They also had lower baseline LARS (18.2% vs 22.6%, p=0.028) and LA contraction strain (9.3% vs. 12.2%, p=0.011), while there were no differences in LV-GLS and LA conduction strain. On multivariable Cox regression analysis, independent predictors of LVSD progression were identified as younger age (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.97, p=0.017, per 5 years), lower LVEF (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.71–0.91, p<0.001), larger LV end-diastolic dimension (HR 1.17, 95% CI 1.06–1.30, p=0.002), and lower LARS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89–0.98, p=0.011). Conclusions: Among HCM patients with borderline LVEF, 21% progressed to overt LVSD. Younger age, lower LVEF, larger LV size and lower LA strain at baseline predicted the development of LVSD.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Severance Hospital (KR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.