Abstract 4144650: Stereotactic Radioablation for Septal Ventricular Tachycardia

Background: Intramural septal substrate represents a major challenge in patients undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) ablation because the septal thickness could make difficult for radiofrequency to achieve transmural lesions. Although novel approaches have been proposed to treat septal VT, about half of patients experienced VT recurrence and the risk of peri-procedural complications including Atrioventricular Block (AVB) remained high. Stereotactic Arrhythmia Ablation (STAR) was introduced to treat VT refractory to catheter ablation nevertheless no data are available in the setting of septal VT. Objectives: to evaluate the arrhythmic burden in patients with septal VT treated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging guided STAR (MRgSTAR). Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with septal VT substrate. The therapy target was achieved combining anatomical/functional and electrophysiological data (Fig. 1). Patients were treated with a single fraction of 25Gy adopting MRgSTAR (Fig. 2). All patients were clinically followed-up and all implantable cardiac device were remote monitored. The efficacy outcome included recurrences of any sustained VT beyond the 6-weeks blanking-period after MRgSTAR. The safety outcome was the incidence of adverse events and AVB. Results: We included 11 patients with septal substrate VT [median age:68yrs (IQR:64.5–78yrs); 100% male]. Clinical presentation was electrical storm in 81.8% of patients. No complications occurred after MRgSTAR and six (54.5%) patients were discharged the same day of treatment. During a mean follow-up of 12±6 months, the efficacy outcome occurred in three (27.3%) cases. A significative reduction of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) therapy (23.6 before MRgSTAR vs 1.7 after MRgSTAR, p-value:<0.001) was observed (Fig. 3). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly after treatment [38%(IQR:33.5-42%) before MRgSTAR vs 43.8%(IQR:35–47%) after MRgSTAR; p-value:0.04]. No adverse effects were observed in ICD system performance, lead thresholds, or lead impedances at any point after treatment. In the seven patients with preserved AV conduction, no AVB or left/right branch block were reported after STAR. No difference in the percentage of ventricular pacing was described before and after STAR [3.5% (IQR:2.75-4%) before STAR vs 4.5% (IQR: 3.25–5.5%) after STAR; p-value: 0.24]. Conclusions: MRgSTAR represents a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of septal VT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144650
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144650: Stereotactic Radioablation for Septal Ventricular Tachycardia

Pietro Rossi, Antonio Bisignani, D. Marchesano, Michele Magnocavallo et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Abstract 4144650: Stereotactic Radioablation for Septal Ventricular Tachycardia

Pietro Rossi, Antonio Bisignani, D. Marchesano, Michele Magnocavallo, Cristian Borrazzo, Alessandra Castelluccia, Stefano Bianchi, Marco Polselli, Randa El Gawhary, Piercarlo Gentile, Paolo Di Renzi, Gianmarco Grimaldi, Filippo Maria Cauti
article en

Abstract

Background: Intramural septal substrate represents a major challenge in patients undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) ablation because the septal thickness could make difficult for radiofrequency to achieve transmural lesions. Although novel approaches have been proposed to treat septal VT, about half of patients experienced VT recurrence and the risk of peri-procedural complications including Atrioventricular Block (AVB) remained high. Stereotactic Arrhythmia Ablation (STAR) was introduced to treat VT refractory to catheter ablation nevertheless no data are available in the setting of septal VT. Objectives: to evaluate the arrhythmic burden in patients with septal VT treated with Magnetic Resonance Imaging guided STAR (MRgSTAR). Methods: We enrolled consecutive patients with septal VT substrate. The therapy target was achieved combining anatomical/functional and electrophysiological data (Fig. 1). Patients were treated with a single fraction of 25Gy adopting MRgSTAR (Fig. 2). All patients were clinically followed-up and all implantable cardiac device were remote monitored. The efficacy outcome included recurrences of any sustained VT beyond the 6-weeks blanking-period after MRgSTAR. The safety outcome was the incidence of adverse events and AVB. Results: We included 11 patients with septal substrate VT [median age:68yrs (IQR:64.5–78yrs); 100% male]. Clinical presentation was electrical storm in 81.8% of patients. No complications occurred after MRgSTAR and six (54.5%) patients were discharged the same day of treatment. During a mean follow-up of 12±6 months, the efficacy outcome occurred in three (27.3%) cases. A significative reduction of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) therapy (23.6 before MRgSTAR vs 1.7 after MRgSTAR, p-value:<0.001) was observed (Fig. 3). Left ventricular ejection fraction increased significantly after treatment [38%(IQR:33.5-42%) before MRgSTAR vs 43.8%(IQR:35–47%) after MRgSTAR; p-value:0.04]. No adverse effects were observed in ICD system performance, lead thresholds, or lead impedances at any point after treatment. In the seven patients with preserved AV conduction, no AVB or left/right branch block were reported after STAR. No difference in the percentage of ventricular pacing was described before and after STAR [3.5% (IQR:2.75-4%) before STAR vs 4.5% (IQR: 3.25–5.5%) after STAR; p-value: 0.24]. Conclusions: MRgSTAR represents a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of septal VT.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Fatebenefratelli Hospital (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.