Abstract 4144486: Early versus Delayed Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion After Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes significantly increased risk of stroke and patients often need to be on lifelong anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device is an alternative approach to prevent strokes in patients who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Patients undergoing LAA electrical isolation (LAAEI) as part of their ablation strategy are at increased risk of stroke due to the loss of LAA contractility. In patients with prior LAAEI, the optimum timing of LAAO is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether early versus delayed LAAO impacts risk of stroke in patients with prior LAAEI adherent to anticoagulation. Methods: Patients who received both LAAEI and LAAO were included in this analysis. Demographics, co-morbidities, anticoagulation adherence, timing between LAAEI and LAAO, and occurrence of stroke between LAAEI and LAAO were summarized. Patients who received LAAO ≤6 month of LAAEI were designated as the early group, and those >6 month the late group. Results: A total of 171 patients were included in this study with 135 in the early group and 36 in the late group and all patients were adherent to oral anticoagulation. Patients in the early vs late group had similar age (69.8 vs 70.7 yr), BMI (28.8 vs 27.3 kg/m 2 ), CHA 2 DS 2 -VAS C score (2.19 vs 1.83), left ventricular ejection fraction (57.9% vs 57.9%), diabetes (88.9% vs 87.4%), LAA maximum orifice width (18.1 vs 18.5 mm) and percentage of paroxysmal AF (25.0% vs 25.9%). Patients in the early group were more likely to be male but did not reach statistical significance (83.3% vs 71.8%, p=0.161). During a mean follow up duration of 18.6 ± 5.5 months after LAAEI, no stroke events occurred in either group between the date of LAAEI and date of LAAO. Conclusion: Delayed LAAO after >6 month of LAAEI is not associated with increased risk of stroke compared to early LAAO (≤6 month) in patients adherent with oral anticoagulation. Delayed occlusion allows for the opportunity to confirm LAAEI and reisolate if needed as the effectiveness and technical difficulty of LAA ablation significantly increases after LAAO.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144486
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144486: Early versus Delayed Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion After Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation

Sanghamitra Mohanty, Giuseppe Ammirati, Luigi Di Biase, Aung Lin et al.
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4144486: Early versus Delayed Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion After Left Atrial Appendage Electrical Isolation

Sanghamitra Mohanty, Giuseppe Ammirati, Luigi Di Biase, Aung Lin, Jacopo Marazzato, Michael Freilich, Nicoletta Ventrella, Andrea Natale, Vincenzo Mirco La Fazia, Xiao-Dong Zhang, Fei Zou, Juan Cedeno Serna
article en

Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) causes significantly increased risk of stroke and patients often need to be on lifelong anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) device is an alternative approach to prevent strokes in patients who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Patients undergoing LAA electrical isolation (LAAEI) as part of their ablation strategy are at increased risk of stroke due to the loss of LAA contractility. In patients with prior LAAEI, the optimum timing of LAAO is unknown. Objective: The aim of this study is to investigate whether early versus delayed LAAO impacts risk of stroke in patients with prior LAAEI adherent to anticoagulation. Methods: Patients who received both LAAEI and LAAO were included in this analysis. Demographics, co-morbidities, anticoagulation adherence, timing between LAAEI and LAAO, and occurrence of stroke between LAAEI and LAAO were summarized. Patients who received LAAO ≤6 month of LAAEI were designated as the early group, and those >6 month the late group. Results: A total of 171 patients were included in this study with 135 in the early group and 36 in the late group and all patients were adherent to oral anticoagulation. Patients in the early vs late group had similar age (69.8 vs 70.7 yr), BMI (28.8 vs 27.3 kg/m 2 ), CHA 2 DS 2 -VAS C score (2.19 vs 1.83), left ventricular ejection fraction (57.9% vs 57.9%), diabetes (88.9% vs 87.4%), LAA maximum orifice width (18.1 vs 18.5 mm) and percentage of paroxysmal AF (25.0% vs 25.9%). Patients in the early group were more likely to be male but did not reach statistical significance (83.3% vs 71.8%, p=0.161). During a mean follow up duration of 18.6 ± 5.5 months after LAAEI, no stroke events occurred in either group between the date of LAAEI and date of LAAO. Conclusion: Delayed LAAO after >6 month of LAAEI is not associated with increased risk of stroke compared to early LAAO (≤6 month) in patients adherent with oral anticoagulation. Delayed occlusion allows for the opportunity to confirm LAAEI and reisolate if needed as the effectiveness and technical difficulty of LAA ablation significantly increases after LAAO.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Montefiore Medical Center (US), Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.