Abstract 4144811: Durability of Left Bundle Branch Area Capture over Time: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a rapidly growing and widely adopted conduction system pacing (CSP) technique. However, little is known about the durability of left bundle branch area capture (LBBAC) over time. Objective: Evaluate durability of LBBA capture after achieving acute LBBAC at time of implant. Methods: Consecutive LBBAP implants or CSP upgrades by a single operator were retrospectively evaluated. A Medtronic (MDT) C315 sheath was used to deliver a MDT 3830 lead to the LBBA in all cases. QRS width, LV activation time (LVAT), V6-V1 inter-peak interval (V6-V1I) and the presence of R’ in V1 at the time of initial CSP implant and at most recent follow up ECG were measured to determine durability of LBBAC over time. LBBAC was defined as presence of R’ in V1, along with LVAT < 90 msec. Loss of LBBAC was defined as loss of R’ in V1 in follow up along with either increase in QRS duration and/or LVAT. Results: We attempted LBBAP in 108 pts with acute success in 92 (85.2%). The remaining 16 patients (14.8%) demonstrated deep septal pacing. Mean QRS duration at implant for those achieving acute LBBA capture was 130 +/- 12 msec, with mean LVAT of 72 +/- 12 msec, and V6-V1I of 46 +/- 18 msec. After excluding patients with minimal RV pacing and those lost to follow up, 46 patients with acute LBBAC had follow up ECGs available. After a median follow up of 300 days, 44 patients (96%) retained LBBAC with stable QRS duration (125 +/- 16 msec), LVAT (70 +/- 16 msec), and V6-V1I (43 +/- 19 msec). Two patients (4.3%) lost LBBAC, as evidenced by loss of R’, transition to an RV septal paced morphology, and increased LVAT and paced QRS duration. Pacing thresholds remained stable over time. No patients required upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy. Conclusion: In this retrospective study, LBBAC is durable over approximately one year follow up. Longer term follow up data is required to determine long-term durability of this pacing technique, particularly in patients with CRT indications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144811
Primary Topic
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144811: Durability of Left Bundle Branch Area Capture over Time: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Tharian S. Cherian, William A. Belden, Ali J. Noory, George Shaw et al.
Circulation
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
article

Abstract 4144811: Durability of Left Bundle Branch Area Capture over Time: A Single Center Retrospective Analysis

Tharian S. Cherian, William A. Belden, Ali J. Noory, George Shaw, Amit J. Thosani, Mati Friehling, Ali Jafry, John Chenarides, Joshua R. Silverstein, Emerson Liu
article en

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a rapidly growing and widely adopted conduction system pacing (CSP) technique. However, little is known about the durability of left bundle branch area capture (LBBAC) over time. Objective: Evaluate durability of LBBA capture after achieving acute LBBAC at time of implant. Methods: Consecutive LBBAP implants or CSP upgrades by a single operator were retrospectively evaluated. A Medtronic (MDT) C315 sheath was used to deliver a MDT 3830 lead to the LBBA in all cases. QRS width, LV activation time (LVAT), V6-V1 inter-peak interval (V6-V1I) and the presence of R’ in V1 at the time of initial CSP implant and at most recent follow up ECG were measured to determine durability of LBBAC over time. LBBAC was defined as presence of R’ in V1, along with LVAT < 90 msec. Loss of LBBAC was defined as loss of R’ in V1 in follow up along with either increase in QRS duration and/or LVAT. Results: We attempted LBBAP in 108 pts with acute success in 92 (85.2%). The remaining 16 patients (14.8%) demonstrated deep septal pacing. Mean QRS duration at implant for those achieving acute LBBA capture was 130 +/- 12 msec, with mean LVAT of 72 +/- 12 msec, and V6-V1I of 46 +/- 18 msec. After excluding patients with minimal RV pacing and those lost to follow up, 46 patients with acute LBBAC had follow up ECGs available. After a median follow up of 300 days, 44 patients (96%) retained LBBAC with stable QRS duration (125 +/- 16 msec), LVAT (70 +/- 16 msec), and V6-V1I (43 +/- 19 msec). Two patients (4.3%) lost LBBAC, as evidenced by loss of R’, transition to an RV septal paced morphology, and increased LVAT and paced QRS duration. Pacing thresholds remained stable over time. No patients required upgrade for pacing induced cardiomyopathy. Conclusion: In this retrospective study, LBBAC is durable over approximately one year follow up. Longer term follow up data is required to determine long-term durability of this pacing technique, particularly in patients with CRT indications.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Allegheny Health Network (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.