Abstract 4145234: <u>Trends in 30-Day Readmission Rate, Mortality Outcome and Resources Utilization Among Patient who underwent Leadless Pacemaker Revision and Removal.</u>

Background: Leadless pacemakers (LPM) utilization has grown significantly, yet data on LPM removal and/or revision (LPM-RR) remains limited. This study aims to evaluate trends in 30-day readmission rate (30-dRr), mortality, and resource utilization associated with LPM-RR Method: We analyzed data from the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2021. Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent LPM-RR were identified using ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was the trend on 30-dRr following LPM-RR. Secondary outcomes included mortality, resource utilization (Length of stay {LOS}&amp;inflation-adjusted mean hospital cost),&amp;most common readmission diagnosis. Predictive marginal effects over the years&amp;regression analyses were conducted. Results: LPMs placement increased from 350 in 2016 to 16,225 in 2021 (p-trend &lt; 0.001), while the rate of revisions and removals declined from 6.2% to 1.2% (p-trend &lt; 0.001). The mean age at index admission was 70.9 years with 51.6% females, compared to 71.6 years and 60.8% males among readmitted patients. The 30-dRr increased slightly from 13.8% in 2016 to 16% in 2021 (p trend = 0.1). Index admission mortality trends were non-significant, decreasing from 7.4% in 2017 to 4.2% in 2021 (p-trend = 0.4). Readmission mortality trends also remained non-significant, from 8.3% in 2016 to 8.4% in 2021 (p-trend = 0.3). The index admission mean LOS was 12.1 days in 2016 to 10.2 days in 2021 (p trend = 0.09), while readmission mean LOS was 4.1 days to 3.8 days (p trend = 0.9). The inflation-adjusted mean hospital cost for index admissions decreased from $76,432.5 in 2016 to $61,501 in 2021 (p trend = 0.08), whereas readmission costs increased from $6,773 to $9,358 (p-trend = 0.7). The most common reason for readmission was hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Conclusion: From 2016 to 2021, LPM implantation grew rapidly with a significant decline in revision and removal rates. During this period, 30-dRr&amp;resource utilization have remained relatively stable, with a trend toward decreasing mortality within 30 days after LPM implantation, likely owing to technology/technique advancements, increased experience, as well as patient selection. Further research is needed to assess outcomes for the rapidly evolving use of LPM in an increasingly broader range of patient populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145234
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4145234: <u>Trends in 30-Day Readmission Rate, Mortality Outcome and Resources Utilization Among Patient who underwent Leadless Pacemaker Revision and Removal.</u>

Michael Fatuyi, Sunil K. Vasireddi, Aria Kenarsary, Temidayo Abe et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
article

Abstract 4145234: <u>Trends in 30-Day Readmission Rate, Mortality Outcome and Resources Utilization Among Patient who underwent Leadless Pacemaker Revision and Removal.</u>

Michael Fatuyi, Sunil K. Vasireddi, Aria Kenarsary, Temidayo Abe, Daniel Modaff, Zachary D. Goldberger, Joseph Amoah, Matthew M. Kalscheur, Ndausung Udongwo, Akinwale C. Iyeku, J. G. Stacy, Oluwasegun Akinti
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Leadless pacemakers (LPM) utilization has grown significantly, yet data on LPM removal and/or revision (LPM-RR) remains limited. This study aims to evaluate trends in 30-day readmission rate (30-dRr), mortality, and resource utilization associated with LPM-RR Method: We analyzed data from the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2016 to 2021. Patients ≥ 18 years who underwent LPM-RR were identified using ICD-10 codes. The primary outcome was the trend on 30-dRr following LPM-RR. Secondary outcomes included mortality, resource utilization (Length of stay {LOS}&amp;inflation-adjusted mean hospital cost),&amp;most common readmission diagnosis. Predictive marginal effects over the years&amp;regression analyses were conducted. Results: LPMs placement increased from 350 in 2016 to 16,225 in 2021 (p-trend &lt; 0.001), while the rate of revisions and removals declined from 6.2% to 1.2% (p-trend &lt; 0.001). The mean age at index admission was 70.9 years with 51.6% females, compared to 71.6 years and 60.8% males among readmitted patients. The 30-dRr increased slightly from 13.8% in 2016 to 16% in 2021 (p trend = 0.1). Index admission mortality trends were non-significant, decreasing from 7.4% in 2017 to 4.2% in 2021 (p-trend = 0.4). Readmission mortality trends also remained non-significant, from 8.3% in 2016 to 8.4% in 2021 (p-trend = 0.3). The index admission mean LOS was 12.1 days in 2016 to 10.2 days in 2021 (p trend = 0.09), while readmission mean LOS was 4.1 days to 3.8 days (p trend = 0.9). The inflation-adjusted mean hospital cost for index admissions decreased from $76,432.5 in 2016 to $61,501 in 2021 (p trend = 0.08), whereas readmission costs increased from $6,773 to $9,358 (p-trend = 0.7). The most common reason for readmission was hypertensive heart disease with heart failure. Conclusion: From 2016 to 2021, LPM implantation grew rapidly with a significant decline in revision and removal rates. During this period, 30-dRr&amp;resource utilization have remained relatively stable, with a trend toward decreasing mortality within 30 days after LPM implantation, likely owing to technology/technique advancements, increased experience, as well as patient selection. Further research is needed to assess outcomes for the rapidly evolving use of LPM in an increasingly broader range of patient populations.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Vanderbilt University (US), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), UW Health University Hospital (US), Brookdale University Hospital and Medical Center (US), Morehouse College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.