Abstract 4145163: Postprocedural Anticoagulation Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Background: The use of procedural anticoagulation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is well established and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite its widespread application in clinical settings, the necessity and efficacy of postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) remain contentious. Thus, this is the first meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of PPA after PCI for the management of STEMI. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes between PPA administration and control (placebo or no anticoagulant infusion) following PCI for STEMI treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.4.1, employing a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of four studies comprising 45,066 patients were included (2 RCTs and 2 non-randomized studies), of which 30,925 (68.6%) received PPA. Among the included patients, 35,770 (79.4%) were female. Compared to the control group, PPA did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.49 – 1.36; P=0.44), cardiac death (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.49 – 1.33; P=0.41), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.64 – 1.47; P=0.88; Figure 1A). Moreover, the odds of stent thrombosis (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.92 – 1.68; P=0.15), myocardial infarction (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.79 – 1.36; P= 0.81) and stroke (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.41 – 2.20; P=0.90) did not differ between the groups. However, patients receiving PPA were associated with higher odds of TIMI major/minor bleeding (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.20 – 1.84; P<0.01; Figure 1B). Conclusions: This meta-analysis reveals no significant differences in the odds of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, MACE, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction and stroke between PPA and control following PCI for the management of STEMI. However, PPA was associated with higher odds of TIMI major/minor bleeding when compared to control. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to corroborate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145163
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4145163: Postprocedural Anticoagulation Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Lucca Moreira Lopes, Ana Paula Lima, Humberto Graner Moreira, Izadora Oliveira et al.
Circulation
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Abstract 4145163: Postprocedural Anticoagulation Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Lucca Moreira Lopes, Ana Paula Lima, Humberto Graner Moreira, Izadora Oliveira, Pedro Lucas Alves Alencar, Natália Gaban, Vinícius Martins Rodrigues Oliveira, A Silva
article en

Abstract

Background: The use of procedural anticoagulation during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is well established and has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Despite its widespread application in clinical settings, the necessity and efficacy of postprocedural anticoagulation (PPA) remain contentious. Thus, this is the first meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of PPA after PCI for the management of STEMI. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes between PPA administration and control (placebo or no anticoagulant infusion) following PCI for STEMI treatment. Statistical analyses were performed using RevMan version 5.4.1, employing a random-effects model to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of four studies comprising 45,066 patients were included (2 RCTs and 2 non-randomized studies), of which 30,925 (68.6%) received PPA. Among the included patients, 35,770 (79.4%) were female. Compared to the control group, PPA did not significantly reduce all-cause mortality (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.49 – 1.36; P=0.44), cardiac death (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.49 – 1.33; P=0.41), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.64 – 1.47; P=0.88; Figure 1A). Moreover, the odds of stent thrombosis (OR 1.24; 95% CI 0.92 – 1.68; P=0.15), myocardial infarction (OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.79 – 1.36; P= 0.81) and stroke (OR 0.95; 95% CI 0.41 – 2.20; P=0.90) did not differ between the groups. However, patients receiving PPA were associated with higher odds of TIMI major/minor bleeding (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.20 – 1.84; P<0.01; Figure 1B). Conclusions: This meta-analysis reveals no significant differences in the odds of all-cause mortality, cardiac death, MACE, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction and stroke between PPA and control following PCI for the management of STEMI. However, PPA was associated with higher odds of TIMI major/minor bleeding when compared to control. Further randomized controlled trials are warranted to corroborate these findings.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), Universidade Estadual de Goiás (BR), Universidade de Rio Verde (BR), Universidade Federal de Goiás (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.