Abstract 4144991: Exploring Optimal Cardiac Electronic Implantable Devices Programming: Reducing Non-Actionable Alerts and Assessing Clinical Outcomes

Background: Remote monitoring for cardiac electronic implantable devices (CIEDs) has become standard of care, resulting in an abundance of remote transmission data. While this data is valuable, the number of clinically irrelevant non-actionable alerts (NAA) can lead to alert fatigue and reduce device clinic efficiency. Objective: We aimed to propose clinically reasonable alert parameters to reduce the number of NAA and explore its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: We included 412 participants with CIEDs indicated for atrial fibrillation (AF) or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) from a single academic medical center. Reprogramming changes set as no alerts for AF episodes < 5.5 hours, persistent AF episodes > 1 month when a prior alert has already been issued, AF episodes < 24 hours in patients with paroxysmal AF on anticoagulation or with left atrial appendage occlusion, NSVT in patients with defibrillators. The number of NAAs were tracked 90 days before and after reprogramming. Incident ischemic stroke and sudden cardiac death (SCD) was ascertained over a median follow-up of 20.9 months. Linear regression was used to compare differences in alarms between pre- and post-periods, and multivariable linear regression was applied to identify factors associated with alerts. Results: Among participants, indication for reprogramming included 69% (n=285) patients with AF and 30.7% (n=127) with NSVT. Compared to pre-programming, the number of NAAs was significantly lower post reprogramming implementation (median [IQR]: 3 [6] vs. 1 [2], P < 0.001) respectively. During follow up, the incidence of primary outcomes was 3.6% ( n :15) for ischemic stroke and 0.7% ( n= 3) for SCD. ( Table ) Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that implementing guidelines-derived alert parameters in patients with CIEDs significantly reduces the number of clinically irrelevant NAA. This reduction in NAA appears to be safe, with incidence of adverse clinical outcomes comparable to the general population of patients with CIED. This approach has the potential toreduce clinician alert fatigue and safely improve efficiency of device clinics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144991
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144991: Exploring Optimal Cardiac Electronic Implantable Devices Programming: Reducing Non-Actionable Alerts and Assessing Clinical Outcomes

John Dillon, Prashant D. Bhave, George Bodziock, Amber Seiler et al.
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4144991: Exploring Optimal Cardiac Electronic Implantable Devices Programming: Reducing Non-Actionable Alerts and Assessing Clinical Outcomes

John Dillon, Prashant D. Bhave, George Bodziock, Amber Seiler, Lindsey Cotten, Mohamed A. Mostafa, James Allred
article en

Abstract

Background: Remote monitoring for cardiac electronic implantable devices (CIEDs) has become standard of care, resulting in an abundance of remote transmission data. While this data is valuable, the number of clinically irrelevant non-actionable alerts (NAA) can lead to alert fatigue and reduce device clinic efficiency. Objective: We aimed to propose clinically reasonable alert parameters to reduce the number of NAA and explore its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: We included 412 participants with CIEDs indicated for atrial fibrillation (AF) or non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) from a single academic medical center. Reprogramming changes set as no alerts for AF episodes < 5.5 hours, persistent AF episodes > 1 month when a prior alert has already been issued, AF episodes < 24 hours in patients with paroxysmal AF on anticoagulation or with left atrial appendage occlusion, NSVT in patients with defibrillators. The number of NAAs were tracked 90 days before and after reprogramming. Incident ischemic stroke and sudden cardiac death (SCD) was ascertained over a median follow-up of 20.9 months. Linear regression was used to compare differences in alarms between pre- and post-periods, and multivariable linear regression was applied to identify factors associated with alerts. Results: Among participants, indication for reprogramming included 69% (n=285) patients with AF and 30.7% (n=127) with NSVT. Compared to pre-programming, the number of NAAs was significantly lower post reprogramming implementation (median [IQR]: 3 [6] vs. 1 [2], P < 0.001) respectively. During follow up, the incidence of primary outcomes was 3.6% ( n :15) for ischemic stroke and 0.7% ( n= 3) for SCD. ( Table ) Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate that implementing guidelines-derived alert parameters in patients with CIEDs significantly reduces the number of clinically irrelevant NAA. This reduction in NAA appears to be safe, with incidence of adverse clinical outcomes comparable to the general population of patients with CIED. This approach has the potential toreduce clinician alert fatigue and safely improve efficiency of device clinics.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Remote Sensing Solutions (United States) (US), Wake Forest University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.