Abstract 4144894: Patient Frailty Rather than Procedural Approach Associated with Loss of Life and Limb

Objectives: Evidence behind frail patients preferentially undergoing endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease remains sparse; thus, we evaluated the association of frailty and revascularization-approach with long-term mortality and major adverse limb events (MALE). Methods: VQI-Medicare linked VISION databases were queried for patients who had their first infrainguinal open or endovascular (endo) procedure between 2011-2015 [N=27,200]. Frailty was measured using the VQI-Risk Analysis Index (RAI) and dichotomized into “frail” (RAI≥37) and “non-frail” (RAI<37). The primary endpoints were 4-year mortality and MALE (major amputation and/or reintervention). Associations of frailty and approach were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox hazards regression using an interaction term and stratified by indication. Results: Frail patients experienced significantly worse mortality and amputation-free survival, but both frail and non-frail patients experienced worse survival following an endo first approach (Figure 1, both log-rank p < 0.001). In adjusted Cox regression, frail patients with CLTI were at significantly increased risk of amputation (HR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.18-1.56; p <.0001), MALE (HR:1.09, 95% CI:1-1.19; P=.049) and mortality (HR = 2.70; 95% CI: 2.51-2.89; p <.0001); endo approach for CLTI demonstrated a similar pattern of adverse outcomes (Table 1). However, interaction terms were not significant - the effects of frailty and approach did not influence each other. In claudicants, frailty was associated with increased mortality (HR = 3.05; 95% CI: 2.40-3.86; p <.0001) but not MALE, and endo approach was associated with increased MALE but not amputation; again, interaction terms were not significant. Conclusion: Endovascular approach did not mitigate the adverse effects of frailty on life and limb-related outcomes, thereby underscoring the need for frailty screening and accordingly tailoring treatment and managing expectations given their high mortality risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4144894
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4144894: Patient Frailty Rather than Procedural Approach Associated with Loss of Life and Limb

Elizabeth George, Katherine D. Arnow, Arash Fereydooni, Amber W. Trickey et al.
Circulation
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Abstract 4144894: Patient Frailty Rather than Procedural Approach Associated with Loss of Life and Limb

Elizabeth George, Katherine D. Arnow, Arash Fereydooni, Amber W. Trickey, Sabina Sorondo, Aditi Kashikar, Shipra Arya
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Evidence behind frail patients preferentially undergoing endovascular interventions for peripheral arterial disease remains sparse; thus, we evaluated the association of frailty and revascularization-approach with long-term mortality and major adverse limb events (MALE). Methods: VQI-Medicare linked VISION databases were queried for patients who had their first infrainguinal open or endovascular (endo) procedure between 2011-2015 [N=27,200]. Frailty was measured using the VQI-Risk Analysis Index (RAI) and dichotomized into “frail” (RAI≥37) and “non-frail” (RAI<37). The primary endpoints were 4-year mortality and MALE (major amputation and/or reintervention). Associations of frailty and approach were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox hazards regression using an interaction term and stratified by indication. Results: Frail patients experienced significantly worse mortality and amputation-free survival, but both frail and non-frail patients experienced worse survival following an endo first approach (Figure 1, both log-rank p < 0.001). In adjusted Cox regression, frail patients with CLTI were at significantly increased risk of amputation (HR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.18-1.56; p <.0001), MALE (HR:1.09, 95% CI:1-1.19; P=.049) and mortality (HR = 2.70; 95% CI: 2.51-2.89; p <.0001); endo approach for CLTI demonstrated a similar pattern of adverse outcomes (Table 1). However, interaction terms were not significant - the effects of frailty and approach did not influence each other. In claudicants, frailty was associated with increased mortality (HR = 3.05; 95% CI: 2.40-3.86; p <.0001) but not MALE, and endo approach was associated with increased MALE but not amputation; again, interaction terms were not significant. Conclusion: Endovascular approach did not mitigate the adverse effects of frailty on life and limb-related outcomes, thereby underscoring the need for frailty screening and accordingly tailoring treatment and managing expectations given their high mortality risk.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Palo Alto University (US), Stanford University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.