Abstract 4145278: Higher Long-Term Variability In Metabolic Parameters From Childhood Is Associated With Poorer Midlife Cognitive Function: The Bogalusa Heart Study

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of risk factors, has been linked to higher risk of dementia in older adults. However, the composite impact of long-term variability of metabolic parameters from childhood on midlife cognitive function is unclear. Methods: We studied 1145 midlife participants of the Bogalusa Heart Study (age at enrollment: 12.2 ± 5.4 years, follow-up: 36.1 ± 3.4 years, age at last exam (midlife): 48.3 ± 5.0 years, 60.9% women, 33.7% Black participants) with ≥3 measurements of metabolic parameters (systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and body mass index (BMI)) across follow-up. MetS was defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, but using BMI >30 kg/m 2 for abdominal obesity. Long-term variability of SBP, FBG, TG, HDL, and BMI from childhood were measured as the residual standard deviation (RSD). Repeated measurements of each parameter were fitted in random-effect models to obtain individual growth curves. Using the growth curves, RSD was obtained as the SD of the difference between each observed and predicted parameter level. A composite variability score (range, 0-10) was defined by 1) assigning 0 points to the lowest tertile of RSD and 2 points to the highest tertile for each parameter, then 2) summing the points for all 5 parameters. Midlife cognitive function was measured by 8 neuropsychological (NP) tests. NP test results were categorized into 3 distinct NP profiles (optimal, average, mixed-low) using cluster analysis. Associations between the composite variability score and NP profiles were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression models, adjusting for education status. Sensitivity analysis excluding participants with MetS at midlife were also performed. Results: A total of 348 (30.4%) participants had MetS at midlife. The odds of having mixed-low cognitive function at midlife increased by 13.3% (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03, 1.24) for a 1-unit increase in the composite variability score, compared to optimal cognitive function, adjusted for education status. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent results in participants without MetS at midlife (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05, 1.33). Conclusions: A graded association was observed between composite long-term variability in metabolic parameters from childhood and poorer midlife cognitive function. Lowering variability of metabolic parameters may be beneficial to midlife cognitive function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4145278
Primary Topic
Birth, Development, and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4145278: Higher Long-Term Variability In Metabolic Parameters From Childhood Is Associated With Poorer Midlife Cognitive Function: The Bogalusa Heart Study

Xuanyi Jin, Ileana De Anda‐Duran, Lydia Bazzano, Soo Jung Kang et al.
Circulation
Birth, Development, and Health
article

Abstract 4145278: Higher Long-Term Variability In Metabolic Parameters From Childhood Is Associated With Poorer Midlife Cognitive Function: The Bogalusa Heart Study

Xuanyi Jin, Ileana De Anda‐Duran, Lydia Bazzano, Soo Jung Kang, Eunsun Gill, Camilo Fernández Alonso
article en

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS), a cluster of risk factors, has been linked to higher risk of dementia in older adults. However, the composite impact of long-term variability of metabolic parameters from childhood on midlife cognitive function is unclear. Methods: We studied 1145 midlife participants of the Bogalusa Heart Study (age at enrollment: 12.2 ± 5.4 years, follow-up: 36.1 ± 3.4 years, age at last exam (midlife): 48.3 ± 5.0 years, 60.9% women, 33.7% Black participants) with ≥3 measurements of metabolic parameters (systolic blood pressure (SBP), fasting blood glucose (FBG), triglyceride (TG), high density lipoprotein (HDL), and body mass index (BMI)) across follow-up. MetS was defined by the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines, but using BMI >30 kg/m 2 for abdominal obesity. Long-term variability of SBP, FBG, TG, HDL, and BMI from childhood were measured as the residual standard deviation (RSD). Repeated measurements of each parameter were fitted in random-effect models to obtain individual growth curves. Using the growth curves, RSD was obtained as the SD of the difference between each observed and predicted parameter level. A composite variability score (range, 0-10) was defined by 1) assigning 0 points to the lowest tertile of RSD and 2 points to the highest tertile for each parameter, then 2) summing the points for all 5 parameters. Midlife cognitive function was measured by 8 neuropsychological (NP) tests. NP test results were categorized into 3 distinct NP profiles (optimal, average, mixed-low) using cluster analysis. Associations between the composite variability score and NP profiles were analyzed using multinomial logistic regression models, adjusting for education status. Sensitivity analysis excluding participants with MetS at midlife were also performed. Results: A total of 348 (30.4%) participants had MetS at midlife. The odds of having mixed-low cognitive function at midlife increased by 13.3% (OR 1.13, 95% CI 1.03, 1.24) for a 1-unit increase in the composite variability score, compared to optimal cognitive function, adjusted for education status. Sensitivity analysis showed consistent results in participants without MetS at midlife (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.05, 1.33). Conclusions: A graded association was observed between composite long-term variability in metabolic parameters from childhood and poorer midlife cognitive function. Lowering variability of metabolic parameters may be beneficial to midlife cognitive function.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Tulane University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Birth, Development, and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.