Me! Me! Me! Me! A study and comparison of ego network representations

From social networks to brain connectivity, ego networks are a simple yet powerful approach to visualizing parts of a larger graph, i.e. those related to a selected focal node — the so-called “ego”. While surveys and comparisons of general graph visualization approaches exist in the literature, we note (i) the many conflicting results of comparisons of adjacency matrices and node-link diagrams, thus motivating further study, as well as (ii) the absence of such systematic comparisons for ego networks specifically. In this paper, we propose the development of empirical recommendations for ego network visualization strategies. First, we survey the literature across application domains and collect examples of network visualizations to identify the most common visual encodings, namely straight-line, radial, and layered node-link diagrams, as well as adjacency matrices. These representations are then applied to a representative, intermediate-sized network and subsequently compared in a large-scale, crowd-sourced user study in a mixed-methods analysis setup to investigate their impact on both user experience and performance. Within the limits of this study, and contrary to previous comparative investigations of adjacency matrices and node-link diagrams (outside of ego networks specifically), participants performed systematically worse when using adjacency matrices than those using node-link diagrammatic representations . Similar to previous comparisons of different node-link diagrams, we do not detect any notable differences in participant performance between the three node-link diagrams . Lastly, our quantitative and qualitative results indicate that participants found adjacency matrices harder to learn, use, and understand than node-link diagrams . We conclude that in terms of both participant experience and performance, a layered node-link diagrammatic representation appears to be the most preferable for ego network visualization purposes. • Literature survey of ego network visualization approaches across domains to characterize the current state of the art. • Identification of the most common approaches for ego network visualization. • Online study on the effect of ego network representation on user performance and experience in mixed methods analysis. • Development of recommendations for the effective visualization of ego networks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers & Graphics
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cag.2024.104123
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Me! Me! Me! Me! A study and comparison of ego network representations

Velitchko Filipov, Henry Ehlers, Hsiang‐Yun Wu, Renata G. Raidou et al.
7 citations
Computers & Graphics
Data Visualization and Analytics
1.74
article

Me! Me! Me! Me! A study and comparison of ego network representations

Velitchko Filipov, Henry Ehlers, Hsiang‐Yun Wu, Renata G. Raidou, Daniel Pahr
article en
7 citations

Abstract

From social networks to brain connectivity, ego networks are a simple yet powerful approach to visualizing parts of a larger graph, i.e. those related to a selected focal node — the so-called “ego”. While surveys and comparisons of general graph visualization approaches exist in the literature, we note (i) the many conflicting results of comparisons of adjacency matrices and node-link diagrams, thus motivating further study, as well as (ii) the absence of such systematic comparisons for ego networks specifically. In this paper, we propose the development of empirical recommendations for ego network visualization strategies. First, we survey the literature across application domains and collect examples of network visualizations to identify the most common visual encodings, namely straight-line, radial, and layered node-link diagrams, as well as adjacency matrices. These representations are then applied to a representative, intermediate-sized network and subsequently compared in a large-scale, crowd-sourced user study in a mixed-methods analysis setup to investigate their impact on both user experience and performance. Within the limits of this study, and contrary to previous comparative investigations of adjacency matrices and node-link diagrams (outside of ego networks specifically), participants performed systematically worse when using adjacency matrices than those using node-link diagrammatic representations . Similar to previous comparisons of different node-link diagrams, we do not detect any notable differences in participant performance between the three node-link diagrams . Lastly, our quantitative and qualitative results indicate that participants found adjacency matrices harder to learn, use, and understand than node-link diagrams . We conclude that in terms of both participant experience and performance, a layered node-link diagrammatic representation appears to be the most preferable for ego network visualization purposes. • Literature survey of ego network visualization approaches across domains to characterize the current state of the art. • Identification of the most common approaches for ego network visualization. • Online study on the effect of ego network representation on user performance and experience in mixed methods analysis. • Development of recommendations for the effective visualization of ego networks.

Computers & GraphicsVol. 125
TU Wien (AT), University of Applied Sciences St Pölten (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Data Visualization and Analytics
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.