Variation in evidence use across policy sectors: the case of Brazil

Abstract Evidence use across policy sectors is widely believed to vary as each sector espouses a specific and dominant pattern in how it sources evidence. This view privileges the idea that a “culture of evidence” serves as a norm that guides behavior in the entire sector. In this article, we seek to nuance the policy sectoral approach to understanding evidence use by analyzing the results of a large-N survey of federal employees in Brazil (n = 2,177). Our findings show a diverse set of cultures of evidence with a few sectors like Science and Technology demonstrating a strong likelihood for using scientific evidence with most sectors showing a mixed pattern of sourcing evidence. However, a majority of the surveyed civil servants show an “indistinct” pattern of evidence use who are likely to not use any sources of evidence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Policy and Society
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae031
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Improvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation in evidence use across policy sectors: the case of Brazil

Natália Massaco Koga, Flávio Lyrio Carneiro, João V. Guedes-Neto, Kidjie Saguin et al.
2 citations
Policy and Society
Educational Assessment and Improvement
2.10
article

Variation in evidence use across policy sectors: the case of Brazil

Natália Massaco Koga, Flávio Lyrio Carneiro, João V. Guedes-Neto, Kidjie Saguin, Pedro Lucas de Moura Palotti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Evidence use across policy sectors is widely believed to vary as each sector espouses a specific and dominant pattern in how it sources evidence. This view privileges the idea that a “culture of evidence” serves as a norm that guides behavior in the entire sector. In this article, we seek to nuance the policy sectoral approach to understanding evidence use by analyzing the results of a large-N survey of federal employees in Brazil (n = 2,177). Our findings show a diverse set of cultures of evidence with a few sectors like Science and Technology demonstrating a strong likelihood for using scientific evidence with most sectors showing a mixed pattern of sourcing evidence. However, a majority of the surveyed civil servants show an “indistinct” pattern of evidence use who are likely to not use any sources of evidence.

Policy and SocietyVol. 43(4)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Institute of Applied Economic Research (BR), Institute for Applied Economic Research (DE), Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Educational Assessment and Improvement
2.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Variation in evidence use across policy sectors: the case of Brazil — Natália Massaco Koga, Flávio Lyrio Carneiro, et al. · Policy and Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS