Variation in evidence use across policy sectors: the case of Brazil
Abstract Evidence use across policy sectors is widely believed to vary as each sector espouses a specific and dominant pattern in how it sources evidence. This view privileges the idea that a “culture of evidence” serves as a norm that guides behavior in the entire sector. In this article, we seek to nuance the policy sectoral approach to understanding evidence use by analyzing the results of a large-N survey of federal employees in Brazil (n = 2,177). Our findings show a diverse set of cultures of evidence with a few sectors like Science and Technology demonstrating a strong likelihood for using scientific evidence with most sectors showing a mixed pattern of sourcing evidence. However, a majority of the surveyed civil servants show an “indistinct” pattern of evidence use who are likely to not use any sources of evidence.
Authors
- Natália Massaco Koga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0143-8373)
- Flávio Lyrio Carneiro
- João V. Guedes-Neto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6881-1166)
- Kidjie Saguin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7658-6568)
- Pedro Lucas de Moura Palotti (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9071-9726)
Institutions
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Institute of Applied Economic Research (BR)
- Institute for Applied Economic Research (DE)
- Fundação Getulio Vargas (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Policy and Society
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puae031
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Educational Assessment and Improvement
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.10