<scp>ChatGPT</scp> for complex text evaluation tasks

Abstract ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have been successful at natural and computer language processing tasks with varying degrees of complexity. This brief communication summarizes the lessons learned from a series of investigations into its use for the complex text analysis task of research quality evaluation. In summary, ChatGPT is very good at understanding and carrying out complex text processing tasks in the sense of producing plausible responses with minimum input from the researcher. Nevertheless, its outputs require systematic testing to assess their value because they can be misleading. In contrast to simple tasks, the outputs from complex tasks are highly varied and better results can be obtained by repeating the prompts multiple times in different sessions and averaging the ChatGPT outputs. Varying ChatGPT's configuration parameters from their defaults does not seem to be useful, except for the length of the output requested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24966
Citations
16
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.56
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ChatGPT for complex text evaluation tasks

Mike A Thelwall
16 citations
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
Topic Modeling
5.56
article

ChatGPT for complex text evaluation tasks

Mike A Thelwall
article en
16 citations

Abstract

Abstract ChatGPT and other large language models (LLMs) have been successful at natural and computer language processing tasks with varying degrees of complexity. This brief communication summarizes the lessons learned from a series of investigations into its use for the complex text analysis task of research quality evaluation. In summary, ChatGPT is very good at understanding and carrying out complex text processing tasks in the sense of producing plausible responses with minimum input from the researcher. Nevertheless, its outputs require systematic testing to assess their value because they can be misleading. In contrast to simple tasks, the outputs from complex tasks are highly varied and better results can be obtained by repeating the prompts multiple times in different sessions and averaging the ChatGPT outputs. Varying ChatGPT's configuration parameters from their defaults does not seem to be useful, except for the length of the output requested.

Journal of the Association for Information Science and TechnologyVol. 76(4)
University of Sheffield (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Topic Modeling
5.56
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.