Parameterizing Haverkamp Model From the Steady‐State of Numerically Generated Infiltration: Influence of Algorithms for Steady‐State Selection
ABSTRACT BEST (Beerkan Estimation of Soil Transfer parameters) methods of soil hydraulic characterisation are widely applied for estimating sorptivity, S , and saturated hydraulic conductivity, K s . Calculating these properties requires choosing the β and γ parameters of the Haverkamp infiltration model. These parameters can be obtained from numerically simulated three‐dimensional (3D) infiltration runs reaching steady‐state. This investigation tested dependence of the estimated β and γ parameters on the algorithm for steady‐state selection using simulated 3D cumulative infiltrations for different soils and initial conditions. Two algorithms used the original simulation outputs and included using (i) a threshold defining steadiness (T‐algorithm) and (ii) the last four data points, yielding a reference value of steady‐state infiltration rate (R‐algorithm). A third algorithm, similar to the R‐algorithm, was applied to previously re‐sampled infiltration data at fixed time intervals (RR‐algorithm). The intercept, b s , of the straight line fitted to the data describing steady‐state on the cumulative infiltration plot depended on the applied algorithm more than the slope of this line. Consequently, β varied with the applied algorithm more than γ . The RR‐algorithm, yielding 0.62 ≤ β ≤ 1.99 and 0.74 ≤ γ ≤ 0.98, was preferred since it mediated between advantages and disadvantages of T‐ and R‐algorithms. The influence of the choice of proper values for β and γ on the estimates of S and K s was evaluated using BEST. Using the default values of β (0.6) and γ (0.75) yielded accurate estimates of S but not of K s . Soil dependent β and γ values should be used in this case. A check of the reliability of the estimates of b s can be made by a sequential analysis of the cumulative infiltration data. Future developments include considering sources differing in size and establishing if the suggested β and γ values apply in general to the available BEST algorithms.
Authors
- Massimo Iovino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3454-2030)
- Vincenzo Bagarello (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3575-549X)
- Laurent Lassabatère (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8625-5455)
- Dario Autovino (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5808-2000)
- Denız Yılmaz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0172-4767)
Institutions
- Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR)
- Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (FR)
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
- École Nationale des Travaux Publics de l'État (FR)
- Munzur University (TR)
- Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
- University of Palermo (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Hydrological Processes
- Published
- 2024-11-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.15330
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Soil and Unsaturated Flow
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.52