Abstract 4138322: Do branched stent grafts for dissecting aortic aneurysms really improve long-term outcomes?

Backgrounds: We have previously used a handmade branched stent graft (SG) to treat thoracic aortic aneurysms. In this study, we examined the long-term results of treatment for dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysms. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, we treated 28 patients with dissecting thoracic aneurysms using the branched SGs. Results: The mean age was 65 ± 14 years; 17 were over 70, and 22 were male. The mean time from the onset of dissection was 5.7 ± 6.3 years; 6 were operated within one year. The mean aneurysm diameter was 59 ± 8 mm. All dissecting aneurysms were located after zone 3. SG branches were one in 24 cases, two in 2, and three in 2. Twenty-two were treated for entry closure and distal landing in the true lumen. Six with limited dissecting aneurysms were treated for entry closure and distal landing in a non-dissected lumen. The cause of perioperative death was pneumonia in 1. The mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.3 years. Entry closure was achieved at 86%, branch patency was 94%, and aneurysm diameter was reduced by an average of 5 ± 14%. There were 6 aneurysm-related deaths. Two were aneurysm ruptures, and each of the 4 was additional operative death, sudden death, SMA occlusion, and type A dissection. The aneurysm-related mortality was 26% at eight years; there was no difference between under 70 and over 70 years old. The cumulative risk of additional procedures was 57% at eight years, and the risk was higher in those over 70 than those under 70 (p<0.05). Thirteen required additional procedures, and 5 required multiple. In detail, re-TEVAR to distal SINE was in 7, re-TEVAR for aneurysm enlargement due to residual false lumen was in 1, re-TEVAR for type 1a endoleak (EL) was in 4, open repair was in 3, stenting for stenosis of true lumen in iliac artery was in 1, stenting for SG branches were in 2, and embolization of the left subclavian artery after re-TEVAR was in 1. Details of open repair were partial arch and thoracic descending replacement for type 1a EL in 1, ascending and partial arch replacement for type 1a EL followed by partial arch and thoracoabdominal replacement in 1, partial arch and thoracoabdominal replacement for distal SINE and aneurysm enlargement in 1. Conclusion: The branched SG for dissecting thoracic aneurysms successfully achieved the initial goal of entry closure, which concept is promising, but requires careful observation for appropriate additional procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138322
Primary Topic
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138322: Do branched stent grafts for dissecting aortic aneurysms really improve long-term outcomes?

Koh Ono, Masahide Kawatou, Fumie Takai, Kazuhiro Takatoku et al.
Circulation
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
article

Abstract 4138322: Do branched stent grafts for dissecting aortic aneurysms really improve long-term outcomes?

Koh Ono, Masahide Kawatou, Fumie Takai, Kazuhiro Takatoku, Junichi Tazaki, Kenji Minatoya, Haruka Fujimoto, Erika Yamamoto, Hiromasa Kira, Tadashi Ikeda, Hiroaki Osada, Kazuyoshi Kanno, Takehiko Matsuo, Ryo Nakanishi, Yasuyuki Fujimoto, Takahide Takeda
article en

Abstract

Backgrounds: We have previously used a handmade branched stent graft (SG) to treat thoracic aortic aneurysms. In this study, we examined the long-term results of treatment for dissecting thoracic aortic aneurysms. Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, we treated 28 patients with dissecting thoracic aneurysms using the branched SGs. Results: The mean age was 65 ± 14 years; 17 were over 70, and 22 were male. The mean time from the onset of dissection was 5.7 ± 6.3 years; 6 were operated within one year. The mean aneurysm diameter was 59 ± 8 mm. All dissecting aneurysms were located after zone 3. SG branches were one in 24 cases, two in 2, and three in 2. Twenty-two were treated for entry closure and distal landing in the true lumen. Six with limited dissecting aneurysms were treated for entry closure and distal landing in a non-dissected lumen. The cause of perioperative death was pneumonia in 1. The mean follow-up was 8.3 ± 5.3 years. Entry closure was achieved at 86%, branch patency was 94%, and aneurysm diameter was reduced by an average of 5 ± 14%. There were 6 aneurysm-related deaths. Two were aneurysm ruptures, and each of the 4 was additional operative death, sudden death, SMA occlusion, and type A dissection. The aneurysm-related mortality was 26% at eight years; there was no difference between under 70 and over 70 years old. The cumulative risk of additional procedures was 57% at eight years, and the risk was higher in those over 70 than those under 70 (p<0.05). Thirteen required additional procedures, and 5 required multiple. In detail, re-TEVAR to distal SINE was in 7, re-TEVAR for aneurysm enlargement due to residual false lumen was in 1, re-TEVAR for type 1a endoleak (EL) was in 4, open repair was in 3, stenting for stenosis of true lumen in iliac artery was in 1, stenting for SG branches were in 2, and embolization of the left subclavian artery after re-TEVAR was in 1. Details of open repair were partial arch and thoracic descending replacement for type 1a EL in 1, ascending and partial arch replacement for type 1a EL followed by partial arch and thoracoabdominal replacement in 1, partial arch and thoracoabdominal replacement for distal SINE and aneurysm enlargement in 1. Conclusion: The branched SG for dissecting thoracic aneurysms successfully achieved the initial goal of entry closure, which concept is promising, but requires careful observation for appropriate additional procedures.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Kyoto University (JP), Japanese Red Cross Society Wakayama Medical Center (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.