Abstract 4138303: Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio Predicts MACE and All-cause Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Patient with Diabetes Mellitus and Non-Diabetes Mellitus

Background: A higher stress hyperglycemic ratio (SHR) has been reported to be associated with adverse cardiac outcomes. However, the role of SHR in predicting clinical outcomes by comparing patients with and without diabetes mellitus is yet to be explored. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of the SHR for predicting major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) and all-cause mortality in ACS patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Methods: Per PRISMA guidelines, we comprehensively reviewed PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS for eligible studies reporting on SHR and its association with MACE (8 studies) and all-cause mortality (7 studies) in ACS patients. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a binary random-effects model, with results displayed as forest plots. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 15 studies with 45,774 patients with ACS were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were males (72.6%) with a mean age of 62.8 years. High SHR was associated with higher odds of MACE (1.93 [1.54–2.42]) and all-cause mortality (1.91 [1.58–2.31]) (Fig. 1). Subgroup analysis revealed increased odds of all-cause mortality (1.69 [1.34–2.11] for patients with diabetes vs 2.12 [1.65–2.71] for patients without diabetes) and MACE (1.60 [1.30–1.97] for patients with diabetes vs 1.44 [1.28–1.62] for patients without diabetes), all p<0.01. (Fig. 2). Additionally, the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis demonstrated that excluding any particular study did not significantly affect outcomes (p<0.05). Conclusions: In patients with ACS, SHR is an independent predictor of MACE and all-cause mortality, irrespective of diabetes status. Strict glycemic control strategies may improve outcomes in this high-risk population. These findings underscore the importance of early recognition and management of stress hyperglycemia in ACS patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138303
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138303: Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio Predicts MACE and All-cause Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Patient with Diabetes Mellitus and Non-Diabetes Mellitus

Ali Danish, Hafeezuddin Ahmed, Rupak Desai, Adil Sarvar Mohammed et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4138303: Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio Predicts MACE and All-cause Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Meta-Analysis Comparing Patient with Diabetes Mellitus and Non-Diabetes Mellitus

Ali Danish, Hafeezuddin Ahmed, Rupak Desai, Adil Sarvar Mohammed, Joanne Mathew, Nanush Damarlapally, Maneeth Mylavarapu, Ramya S. D. Kanagala, Lovekumar Vala, Riya Dhadhal, Meshal Alsulami, Neha Kanthala, Sachin Singh
article en

Abstract

Background: A higher stress hyperglycemic ratio (SHR) has been reported to be associated with adverse cardiac outcomes. However, the role of SHR in predicting clinical outcomes by comparing patients with and without diabetes mellitus is yet to be explored. Objective: To evaluate the prognostic value of the SHR for predicting major adverse cardiovascular (MACE) and all-cause mortality in ACS patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Methods: Per PRISMA guidelines, we comprehensively reviewed PubMed, Google Scholar, and SCOPUS for eligible studies reporting on SHR and its association with MACE (8 studies) and all-cause mortality (7 studies) in ACS patients. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a binary random-effects model, with results displayed as forest plots. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and a leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was performed. P<0.05 was considered significant. Results: A total of 15 studies with 45,774 patients with ACS were included in the analysis. The majority of patients were males (72.6%) with a mean age of 62.8 years. High SHR was associated with higher odds of MACE (1.93 [1.54–2.42]) and all-cause mortality (1.91 [1.58–2.31]) (Fig. 1). Subgroup analysis revealed increased odds of all-cause mortality (1.69 [1.34–2.11] for patients with diabetes vs 2.12 [1.65–2.71] for patients without diabetes) and MACE (1.60 [1.30–1.97] for patients with diabetes vs 1.44 [1.28–1.62] for patients without diabetes), all p<0.01. (Fig. 2). Additionally, the leave-one-out sensitivity analysis demonstrated that excluding any particular study did not significantly affect outcomes (p<0.05). Conclusions: In patients with ACS, SHR is an independent predictor of MACE and all-cause mortality, irrespective of diabetes status. Strict glycemic control strategies may improve outcomes in this high-risk population. These findings underscore the importance of early recognition and management of stress hyperglycemia in ACS patients.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Central Michigan University (US), Mamata Medical College (IN), Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology Surat (IN), Michigan United (US), Kamineni Hospitals (IN), Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak (US), Adelphi University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.