Abstract 4138355: Machine Learning for Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of death globally. Accurate and reliable mortality risk prediction of ACS patients is essential for developing targeted treatment strategies. Existing traditional models offer moderate discriminative value, and do not incorporate contemporary predictors of ACS prognosis. Machine learning (ML) models have emerged as an alternate method that may offer improved risk assessment. This study aims to compare machine learning models with traditional risk scores for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with ACS. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched until 1 st November 2023 for studies comparing ML models with traditional statistical methods for event prediction of ACS patients. The primary outcome was comparative discrimination measured by C-statistics with 95% confidence intervals between ML models and traditional methods in estimating the risk of all-cause mortality. Results: Ten studies were included (239627 patients). The summary C-statistic of all ML models across all endpoints was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92), compared to traditional methods 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.85). The difference in C-statistic between all ML models and traditional methods was 0.07 (p<0.05). Three models undertook external validation, and calibration was inconsistently reported. Conclusion: ML models demonstrated superior discrimination of all-cause mortality for ACS patients compared to traditional risk scores. Despite outperforming well-established prognostic tools such as the GRACE and TIMI scores, current clinical applications of ML approaches remain uncertain, particularly in view of the methodological limitations of existing studies and the need for greater model validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138355
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138355: Machine Learning for Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Aashray Gupta, Stephen Bacchi, Ammar Zaka, Clara K Chow et al.
Circulation
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
article

Abstract 4138355: Machine Learning for Prediction of All-Cause Mortality in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Aashray Gupta, Stephen Bacchi, Ammar Zaka, Clara K Chow, Brandon Stretton, Aravinda Thiagalingam, Justin Chan, Naim Mridha, Fabio Ramponi, Paul A. Gould, Gopal Sivagangabalan, Pramesh Kovoor, Guy J. Maddern, Jayme Bennetts, D. Mutahar, Razeen Parvez, Sarah Zaman, Cecil Mustafiz, Joshua Kovoor
article en

Abstract

Background: Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains one of the leading causes of death globally. Accurate and reliable mortality risk prediction of ACS patients is essential for developing targeted treatment strategies. Existing traditional models offer moderate discriminative value, and do not incorporate contemporary predictors of ACS prognosis. Machine learning (ML) models have emerged as an alternate method that may offer improved risk assessment. This study aims to compare machine learning models with traditional risk scores for predicting all-cause mortality in patients with ACS. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched until 1 st November 2023 for studies comparing ML models with traditional statistical methods for event prediction of ACS patients. The primary outcome was comparative discrimination measured by C-statistics with 95% confidence intervals between ML models and traditional methods in estimating the risk of all-cause mortality. Results: Ten studies were included (239627 patients). The summary C-statistic of all ML models across all endpoints was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86-0.92), compared to traditional methods 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.85). The difference in C-statistic between all ML models and traditional methods was 0.07 (p<0.05). Three models undertook external validation, and calibration was inconsistently reported. Conclusion: ML models demonstrated superior discrimination of all-cause mortality for ACS patients compared to traditional risk scores. Despite outperforming well-established prognostic tools such as the GRACE and TIMI scores, current clinical applications of ML approaches remain uncertain, particularly in view of the methodological limitations of existing studies and the need for greater model validation.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Griffith University (AU), Bond University (AU), Royal North Shore Hospital (AU), Gold Coast Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Westmead Hospital (AU), Yale University (US), Prince Charles Hospital (AU), Westmead Institute (AU), Australian Centre for Heart Health (AU), Victorian Heart Hospital, The University of Adelaide (AU), New York University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.