Abstract 4138427: Frailty Measured by The Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of In-hospital Outcomes After PCI: A Retrospective Nationwide Analysis of 449,857 Patients

Background: Frailty emerges as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes post-cardiac procedures including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various indices have been developed to assess frailty, but no gold standard exists. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a promising frailty index that enables better preoperative evaluation for personalized care. Objective: To assess RAI as a preoperative assessment tool for predicting post-PCI in-hospital outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective cohort analysis, The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016 to 2020 for patients who underwent PCI. Our cohort was stratified depending on RAI score into Robust, Prefrail, Frail, and Very Frail ( Figure 1.A ). Primary outcomes were non-home discharge (NHD), mortality, and extended length of stay (defined as length of stay exceeding 75% of the cohort) (eLOS). The statistical significance of difference in the primary outcomes was assessed amongst the four frailty groups using The Chi-square test ( x 2 ). In addition, RAI was tested for its ability to predict the primary outcomes using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The study sample included 449,857 unweighted admissions, of which 67.09% were males, the median age was 50 (IQR: 46-54), 22.6% were Robust, 54.9% were Prefrail, 19% were Frail, and 3.5% were Very Frail ( Figure 1.A ). Increasing RAI frailty scores (robust versus very frail) correlated with significantly higher NHD (7.64% vs. 61.54%; p<0.0001 ), eLOS (11.42% vs. 54.33%; p<0.0001 ), and mortality (1.25% vs. 7.06%; p<0.0001 ) ( Figure 1.B ). RAI effectively predicted NHD (C-statistic 0.73; 95% CI 0.72-0.73), eLOS (C-statistic 0.68; 95% CI 0.67-0.68), and mortality (C-statistic 0.66; 95% CI 0.65-0.66) ( Figure 1.C ). Conclusion: Frailty, measured by RAI, is a significant predictor of post-PCI in-hospital outcomes, including eLOS, NHD, and mortality. RAI facilitates better patient stratification and personalized care strategies in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138427
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138427: Frailty Measured by The Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of In-hospital Outcomes After PCI: A Retrospective Nationwide Analysis of 449,857 Patients

Mohamed Riad Fouad, Kirellos Said Abbas, Abdul Rahman Akkawi, Basel Abdelazeem et al.
Circulation
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

Abstract 4138427: Frailty Measured by The Risk Analysis Index as a Predictor of In-hospital Outcomes After PCI: A Retrospective Nationwide Analysis of 449,857 Patients

Mohamed Riad Fouad, Kirellos Said Abbas, Abdul Rahman Akkawi, Basel Abdelazeem, Hassan Alshaker, Yazan Almohtasib, Mohammad Akram Kawsara, Kerollos Abdelsayed, Ahmad Nawlo
article en

Abstract

Background: Frailty emerges as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes post-cardiac procedures including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Various indices have been developed to assess frailty, but no gold standard exists. The Risk Analysis Index (RAI) is a promising frailty index that enables better preoperative evaluation for personalized care. Objective: To assess RAI as a preoperative assessment tool for predicting post-PCI in-hospital outcomes. Methods: In this retrospective cohort analysis, The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2016 to 2020 for patients who underwent PCI. Our cohort was stratified depending on RAI score into Robust, Prefrail, Frail, and Very Frail ( Figure 1.A ). Primary outcomes were non-home discharge (NHD), mortality, and extended length of stay (defined as length of stay exceeding 75% of the cohort) (eLOS). The statistical significance of difference in the primary outcomes was assessed amongst the four frailty groups using The Chi-square test ( x 2 ). In addition, RAI was tested for its ability to predict the primary outcomes using the area under the curve (AUC). Results: The study sample included 449,857 unweighted admissions, of which 67.09% were males, the median age was 50 (IQR: 46-54), 22.6% were Robust, 54.9% were Prefrail, 19% were Frail, and 3.5% were Very Frail ( Figure 1.A ). Increasing RAI frailty scores (robust versus very frail) correlated with significantly higher NHD (7.64% vs. 61.54%; p<0.0001 ), eLOS (11.42% vs. 54.33%; p<0.0001 ), and mortality (1.25% vs. 7.06%; p<0.0001 ) ( Figure 1.B ). RAI effectively predicted NHD (C-statistic 0.73; 95% CI 0.72-0.73), eLOS (C-statistic 0.68; 95% CI 0.67-0.68), and mortality (C-statistic 0.66; 95% CI 0.65-0.66) ( Figure 1.C ). Conclusion: Frailty, measured by RAI, is a significant predictor of post-PCI in-hospital outcomes, including eLOS, NHD, and mortality. RAI facilitates better patient stratification and personalized care strategies in clinical practice.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
West Virginia University (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), University of Kansas (US), Wichita State University (US), Magdi Yacoub Heart Foundation (EG), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), Alexandria University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.