Abstract 4138475: Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Right Heart Failure: Insights from Nationwide Readmission Database

Background: The annual number of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed has surpassed that of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as its use expands to patient populations not included in initial clinical trials. However, in patients with Right Heart Failure (RHF), the outcomes of TAVI and SAVR remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2018 to 2021. Using ICD-10 codes, we identified all adult admissions for TAVI and SAVR with the presence of RHF. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications, 30-day readmission rate, length of stay, and total hospitalization charges. Results: The study included 3,712 adult patients with RHF, of which 1,386 (37.3%) underwent TAVI and 2,326 (62.7%) underwent SAVR. Compared to SAVR patients, TAVI patients were older (63 years vs. 76 years, p<0.01) and had a higher burden of peripheral vascular disease, chronic liver disease, and coagulopathy, while SAVR patients had a higher burden of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, left heart failure, chronic lung disease, smoking, malignancy, and anemia. On multivariable analysis, compared to TAVI, SAVR was associated with higher odds of mortality (26.6% vs. 9.3%, p<0.01), mechanical circulatory support use (41.5% vs. 9.22%, p<0.01), respiratory failure (34.2% vs. 10.2%, p<0.01), acute kidney injury (58.1% vs. 37.7%, p<0.01), and need for blood transfusion (31.4% vs. 11.0%, p<0.01). There was no difference in 30-day readmission (13.8% vs. 14.3%, p=0.51) and permanent pacemaker implantation (7.0% vs. 8.7%, p=0.33). SAVR was associated with a longer median hospital stay (14 days vs. 8 days, p<0.01) and higher hospitalization charges ($406,826 vs $265,303, p<0.01). When compared to patients wihout RHF, the presence of RHF predicted higher in-hospital mortality for both TAVI (9.3% vs. 1.2%, p<0.01) as well as SAVR (26.6% vs. 3.7%, p<0.01). Conclusions: From 2018 to 2021, more RHF patients underwent SAVR (62.7%) than TAVI (37.3%), but SAVR was associated with worse short-term outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, in-hospital complications, and healthcare resource utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138475
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138475: Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Right Heart Failure: Insights from Nationwide Readmission Database

Khagendra Dahal, Nava R Sharma, Dhan Bahadur Shrestha, Sajog Kansakar et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Abstract 4138475: Comparative Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Right Heart Failure: Insights from Nationwide Readmission Database

Khagendra Dahal, Nava R Sharma, Dhan Bahadur Shrestha, Sajog Kansakar, Daniel H. Katz, Norbert Moskovits, Jurgen Shtembari, Vijay Shetty, Jishanth Mattumpuram, Kailash Pant
article en

Abstract

Background: The annual number of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) performed has surpassed that of surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) as its use expands to patient populations not included in initial clinical trials. However, in patients with Right Heart Failure (RHF), the outcomes of TAVI and SAVR remain unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmission Database from 2018 to 2021. Using ICD-10 codes, we identified all adult admissions for TAVI and SAVR with the presence of RHF. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital complications, 30-day readmission rate, length of stay, and total hospitalization charges. Results: The study included 3,712 adult patients with RHF, of which 1,386 (37.3%) underwent TAVI and 2,326 (62.7%) underwent SAVR. Compared to SAVR patients, TAVI patients were older (63 years vs. 76 years, p<0.01) and had a higher burden of peripheral vascular disease, chronic liver disease, and coagulopathy, while SAVR patients had a higher burden of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, left heart failure, chronic lung disease, smoking, malignancy, and anemia. On multivariable analysis, compared to TAVI, SAVR was associated with higher odds of mortality (26.6% vs. 9.3%, p<0.01), mechanical circulatory support use (41.5% vs. 9.22%, p<0.01), respiratory failure (34.2% vs. 10.2%, p<0.01), acute kidney injury (58.1% vs. 37.7%, p<0.01), and need for blood transfusion (31.4% vs. 11.0%, p<0.01). There was no difference in 30-day readmission (13.8% vs. 14.3%, p=0.51) and permanent pacemaker implantation (7.0% vs. 8.7%, p=0.33). SAVR was associated with a longer median hospital stay (14 days vs. 8 days, p<0.01) and higher hospitalization charges ($406,826 vs $265,303, p<0.01). When compared to patients wihout RHF, the presence of RHF predicted higher in-hospital mortality for both TAVI (9.3% vs. 1.2%, p<0.01) as well as SAVR (26.6% vs. 3.7%, p<0.01). Conclusions: From 2018 to 2021, more RHF patients underwent SAVR (62.7%) than TAVI (37.3%), but SAVR was associated with worse short-term outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, in-hospital complications, and healthcare resource utilization.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Creighton University (US), Maimonides Medical Center (US), University of Louisville (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Peoria campus of the University of Illinois System (US), Bassett Healthcare Network (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.