Abstract 4138593: Sex-, Age-and Racial- specific disparities, echocardiographic myocardial mechanics and biomarkers, and 1-year survival among patients with heart failure.

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a global health burden affecting millions worldwide, particularly among resource constrained communities. Information is limited regarding addative prognostic relations of sex -, age- and racial- differences, myocardial mechanics and biomarkers, in HFrEF. Aim: Assess prognostic implications of sex-, age- and racial- related disparity in HFrEF; and additive prognostic implications of these parameters to other markers including echocardiography (myocardial mechanics). Methodology: The HFrEF patients’ data were prospectively evaluated during the initial assessment and those hospitalized, and subseguently followed for at least 12months. Patients' KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L Questionnaires were assessed during the initial evaluation and follow-up. Sex, age and racial/ethnic disparities, in-hospital management, follow-ups, health status and 1year mortality were assessed. These parameters were further assessed in addition to biomakers and echocardiographic parameters including LV and RV systolic and distolic strain. Multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to investigate additive prognostic differences. Results: The study population consisted mainly of blacks and major factors were hypertension, diabetes, mitral valve disease, and older age (p<0.0001). Of the initial 2642 screened, only 1883 completed the 1year follow-up visit (mean LVEF 38%). Women were likely to have hypertension, atrial fibrillation and diabetes (p<.001). Rheumatic or valvular heart diseases were more commonly identified among younger, black ethnicity, and males patients. No demonstrated sex differences in functional class and biomarkers including NT-proBNP levels. Men demonstrated significant risk for one-year mortality than women, as was black ethnicity and older age. Impaired strain parameters (RV>LV systolic) were independent risk factors for poor survival, more so when added to sex, racial ethnicity, age and biomarkers i.e. the NT-proBNP levels. Conclusion: The prevalence of HFrEF was higher than anticipated. Men, black ethnicity and older age were associated with a high one-year mortality. Impaired strain (RV>LV systolic) parameters were independent risk factors for poor survival, with additive prognostic implications to sex, racial ethnicity, age and traditional biomarkers. These parameters should be assessed routunely to risk stratify HFrEF patients earlier during their disease course.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138593
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138593: Sex-, Age-and Racial- specific disparities, echocardiographic myocardial mechanics and biomarkers, and 1-year survival among patients with heart failure.

Mamotabo R Matshela
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4138593: Sex-, Age-and Racial- specific disparities, echocardiographic myocardial mechanics and biomarkers, and 1-year survival among patients with heart failure.

Mamotabo R Matshela
article en

Abstract

Background: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is a global health burden affecting millions worldwide, particularly among resource constrained communities. Information is limited regarding addative prognostic relations of sex -, age- and racial- differences, myocardial mechanics and biomarkers, in HFrEF. Aim: Assess prognostic implications of sex-, age- and racial- related disparity in HFrEF; and additive prognostic implications of these parameters to other markers including echocardiography (myocardial mechanics). Methodology: The HFrEF patients’ data were prospectively evaluated during the initial assessment and those hospitalized, and subseguently followed for at least 12months. Patients' KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L Questionnaires were assessed during the initial evaluation and follow-up. Sex, age and racial/ethnic disparities, in-hospital management, follow-ups, health status and 1year mortality were assessed. These parameters were further assessed in addition to biomakers and echocardiographic parameters including LV and RV systolic and distolic strain. Multivariable Cox regression models were fitted to investigate additive prognostic differences. Results: The study population consisted mainly of blacks and major factors were hypertension, diabetes, mitral valve disease, and older age (p<0.0001). Of the initial 2642 screened, only 1883 completed the 1year follow-up visit (mean LVEF 38%). Women were likely to have hypertension, atrial fibrillation and diabetes (p<.001). Rheumatic or valvular heart diseases were more commonly identified among younger, black ethnicity, and males patients. No demonstrated sex differences in functional class and biomarkers including NT-proBNP levels. Men demonstrated significant risk for one-year mortality than women, as was black ethnicity and older age. Impaired strain parameters (RV>LV systolic) were independent risk factors for poor survival, more so when added to sex, racial ethnicity, age and biomarkers i.e. the NT-proBNP levels. Conclusion: The prevalence of HFrEF was higher than anticipated. Men, black ethnicity and older age were associated with a high one-year mortality. Impaired strain (RV>LV systolic) parameters were independent risk factors for poor survival, with additive prognostic implications to sex, racial ethnicity, age and traditional biomarkers. These parameters should be assessed routunely to risk stratify HFrEF patients earlier during their disease course.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Good health and well-being, No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.