Strong-ties and weak-ties rationalities: toward a mental model of the consequences of kinship intensity

There is growing evidence of the connection between variations in kinship intensity and cross-cultural differences in psychological traits. Contributing to this literature on kinship intensity, we put forward a mental model to explain the enduring connection between ancestral niche and psychological traits. Our model posits that two primary orientations or dispositions-strong-ties and weak-ties rationalities-have co-evolved with our ancestral niches to perpetuate-by internalizing and reproducing-the social structure (such as preferences for certain attitudes, values, and beliefs) of the ancestral niche. The findings from 1,291 participants across four societies-China, India, Taiwan, and the United States-support our hypothesis that strong-ties (weak-ties) rationalities, when activated, will endorse strong-tie (weak-ties) values and beliefs. This proposed model contributes to the toolbox of cultural and cross-cultural psychology in a twofold sense: First, in addition to the index of kinship intensity, it offers a measure of kin-based rationality as another predictor of psychological traits; second, it renders intelligible the niche and rationality disconnect prevalent in the globalizing era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1476018
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strong-ties and weak-ties rationalities: toward a mental model of the consequences of kinship intensity

Meetu Khosla, Charles Y. Liu, Jane Terpstra Tong, Michael Harris Bond et al.
2 citations
Frontiers in Psychology
Cultural Differences and Values
1.29
article

Strong-ties and weak-ties rationalities: toward a mental model of the consequences of kinship intensity

Meetu Khosla, Charles Y. Liu, Jane Terpstra Tong, Michael Harris Bond, Louise Sundararajan, Rachel Sing‐Kiat Ting, Sheo Prasad Shukla, Kuang‐Hui Yeh, Virendra Pratap Yadav
article en
2 citations

Abstract

There is growing evidence of the connection between variations in kinship intensity and cross-cultural differences in psychological traits. Contributing to this literature on kinship intensity, we put forward a mental model to explain the enduring connection between ancestral niche and psychological traits. Our model posits that two primary orientations or dispositions-strong-ties and weak-ties rationalities-have co-evolved with our ancestral niches to perpetuate-by internalizing and reproducing-the social structure (such as preferences for certain attitudes, values, and beliefs) of the ancestral niche. The findings from 1,291 participants across four societies-China, India, Taiwan, and the United States-support our hypothesis that strong-ties (weak-ties) rationalities, when activated, will endorse strong-tie (weak-ties) values and beliefs. This proposed model contributes to the toolbox of cultural and cross-cultural psychology in a twofold sense: First, in addition to the index of kinship intensity, it offers a measure of kin-based rationality as another predictor of psychological traits; second, it renders intelligible the niche and rationality disconnect prevalent in the globalizing era.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 15
University of Delhi (IN), Monash University Malaysia (MY), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), University of Allahabad (IN), Wheaton College - Illinois (US), Academia Sinica (TW)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cultural Differences and Values
1.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.