Social targeting conservation subsidies in the Western Lake Erie Basin

Achieving public conservation objectives often requires voluntary conservation on private land. However, some landowners are reluctant to participate in voluntary conservation programs, even when offered financial incentives. Heterogeneity in willingness to participate suggests that policymakers can improve conservation outcomes by strategically targeting subsidy program outreach, messaging, and design to landowners who are more likely to enroll, which we call "social targeting." This paper informs social targeting a subsidy to farmers to construct wetlands in the Western Lake Erie Basin in the United States. We use a discrete choice survey and a latent class model to identify preference heterogeneity and farmer attributes associated with willingness to construct wetlands. Willing respondents prefer larger projects, but fully subsidized construction is vital for participation. Simulation results highlight that even the most willing farmers are unlikely to install a wetland if construction is not fully subsidized. Policy practitioners should target outreach to younger farmers and larger farms. Outreach strategies should focus on private benefits from the wetland, such as aesthetic values and hunting opportunities, highlight farmer responsibility for Lake Erie water quality, and promote positive social norms surrounding wetland construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123103
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social targeting conservation subsidies in the Western Lake Erie Basin

Matthew Ashenfarb, Sandra T. Marquart‐Pyatt, C. Dale Morrison, Rebecca S. Epanchin‐Niell et al.
1 citations
Journal of Environmental Management
Economic and Environmental Valuation
1.13
article

Social targeting conservation subsidies in the Western Lake Erie Basin

Matthew Ashenfarb, Sandra T. Marquart‐Pyatt, C. Dale Morrison, Rebecca S. Epanchin‐Niell, Robyn S. Wilson
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Achieving public conservation objectives often requires voluntary conservation on private land. However, some landowners are reluctant to participate in voluntary conservation programs, even when offered financial incentives. Heterogeneity in willingness to participate suggests that policymakers can improve conservation outcomes by strategically targeting subsidy program outreach, messaging, and design to landowners who are more likely to enroll, which we call "social targeting." This paper informs social targeting a subsidy to farmers to construct wetlands in the Western Lake Erie Basin in the United States. We use a discrete choice survey and a latent class model to identify preference heterogeneity and farmer attributes associated with willingness to construct wetlands. Willing respondents prefer larger projects, but fully subsidized construction is vital for participation. Simulation results highlight that even the most willing farmers are unlikely to install a wetland if construction is not fully subsidized. Policy practitioners should target outreach to younger farmers and larger farms. Outreach strategies should focus on private benefits from the wetland, such as aesthetic values and hunting opportunities, highlight farmer responsibility for Lake Erie water quality, and promote positive social norms surrounding wetland construction.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 371
University of Essex (GB), Resources For The Future (US), Yale University (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US), Michigan State University (US)
National Science Foundation, Resources for the Future, National Socio-Environmental Synthesis Center
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.