Superior forecasting with simple AR(1) models in a low-volatility environment: evidence from the CAT bond market

Abstract In the recent literature on asset pricing, advanced machine learning methods often show better predictive quality than simple linear regression models. In this context, machine learning prediction models for bond premiums are usually based on those predictors that have proved to be particularly relevant in explanatory models. However, these models do not take into account that historical premiums of assets with particularly low premium volatilities already contain a high degree of information about future premiums. With this in mind, we consider catastrophe bonds, whose secondary market premiums exhibit low volatility, and include historical premiums in our forecasting models in addition to the usual predictors. In this way, the predictive accuracy of the linear regression is significantly increased and is comparable to that of advanced machine learning methods. Remarkably, a simple linear AR(1) model without additional predictors achieves the highest predictive performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Asset Management
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41260-024-00379-8
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Superior forecasting with simple AR(1) models in a low-volatility environment: evidence from the CAT bond market

Eileen Witowski, Marc Gürtler
Journal of Asset Management
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

Superior forecasting with simple AR(1) models in a low-volatility environment: evidence from the CAT bond market

Eileen Witowski, Marc Gürtler
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the recent literature on asset pricing, advanced machine learning methods often show better predictive quality than simple linear regression models. In this context, machine learning prediction models for bond premiums are usually based on those predictors that have proved to be particularly relevant in explanatory models. However, these models do not take into account that historical premiums of assets with particularly low premium volatilities already contain a high degree of information about future premiums. With this in mind, we consider catastrophe bonds, whose secondary market premiums exhibit low volatility, and include historical premiums in our forecasting models in addition to the usual predictors. In this way, the predictive accuracy of the linear regression is significantly increased and is comparable to that of advanced machine learning methods. Remarkably, a simple linear AR(1) model without additional predictors achieves the highest predictive performance.

Journal of Asset ManagementVol. 26(3)
Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.