Implicit Meanings in the Quran: A Pragmatic Perspective

This study investigates the interpretation of indirect speech in the Quran, where meanings often extend beyond what is explicitly stated. Misinterpretations can arise when the listener’s understanding differs from the speaker’s intended meaning, a challenge particularly evident in the Quran due to its complex rhetorical nature. Using Thomas’s (1995) Speaker’s Meaning Framework, the research conducts a document analysis from a pragmatic perspective, focusing on the oral discourse between Prophets and their people. The findings, supported by insights from reputable Quranic scholars, highlight that the speaker’s meaning in indirect speech is best understood by considering both context (including physical, environmental, social, cultural, and linguistic factors) and the speaker’s intention. The study concludes that interpretation methods can be divided into those based on context and intention, and those based solely on intention. These insights are significant for guiding readers of the Quran in accurately interpreting indirect speech.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1411.23
Primary Topic
Education and Islamic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implicit Meanings in the Quran: A Pragmatic Perspective

Fariz Azzuan Amat Suparia, Muhammad Syaffiq Mohammed Raffi, Abdul Azim Mohamad Isa, Muhammad Arsyad Abdul Majid et al.
Theory and Practice in Language Studies
Education and Islamic Studies
article

Implicit Meanings in the Quran: A Pragmatic Perspective

Fariz Azzuan Amat Suparia, Muhammad Syaffiq Mohammed Raffi, Abdul Azim Mohamad Isa, Muhammad Arsyad Abdul Majid, Muhamad Zaidi Zakaria, Muhammad Nujaid Khairuddin
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the interpretation of indirect speech in the Quran, where meanings often extend beyond what is explicitly stated. Misinterpretations can arise when the listener’s understanding differs from the speaker’s intended meaning, a challenge particularly evident in the Quran due to its complex rhetorical nature. Using Thomas’s (1995) Speaker’s Meaning Framework, the research conducts a document analysis from a pragmatic perspective, focusing on the oral discourse between Prophets and their people. The findings, supported by insights from reputable Quranic scholars, highlight that the speaker’s meaning in indirect speech is best understood by considering both context (including physical, environmental, social, cultural, and linguistic factors) and the speaker’s intention. The study concludes that interpretation methods can be divided into those based on context and intention, and those based solely on intention. These insights are significant for guiding readers of the Quran in accurately interpreting indirect speech.

Theory and Practice in Language StudiesVol. 14(11)
Universiti Teknologi MARA (MY)
Universiti Teknologi MARA
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Education and Islamic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.