Large language models (LLMs) as agents for augmented democracy

We explore an augmented democracy system built on off-the-shelf large language models (LLMs) fine-tuned to augment data on citizens' preferences elicited over policies extracted from the government programmes of the two main candidates of Brazil's 2022 presidential election. We use a train-test cross-validation set-up to estimate the accuracy with which the LLMs predict both: a subject's individual political choices and the aggregate preferences of the full sample of participants. At the individual level, we find that LLMs predict out of sample preferences more accurately than a 'bundle rule', which would assume that citizens always vote for the proposals of the candidate aligned with their self-reported political orientation. At the population level, we show that a probabilistic sample augmented by an LLM provides a more accurate estimate of the aggregate preferences of a population than the non-augmented probabilistic sample alone. Together, these results indicate that policy preference data augmented using LLMs can capture nuances that transcend party lines and represents a promising avenue of research for data augmentation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance'.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2024.0100
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large language models (LLMs) as agents for augmented democracy

Umberto Grandi, César A. Hidalgo, Jairo Gudiño
11 citations
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences
Social Media and Politics
10.53
article

Large language models (LLMs) as agents for augmented democracy

Umberto Grandi, César A. Hidalgo, Jairo Gudiño
article en
11 citations

Abstract

We explore an augmented democracy system built on off-the-shelf large language models (LLMs) fine-tuned to augment data on citizens' preferences elicited over policies extracted from the government programmes of the two main candidates of Brazil's 2022 presidential election. We use a train-test cross-validation set-up to estimate the accuracy with which the LLMs predict both: a subject's individual political choices and the aggregate preferences of the full sample of participants. At the individual level, we find that LLMs predict out of sample preferences more accurately than a 'bundle rule', which would assume that citizens always vote for the proposals of the candidate aligned with their self-reported political orientation. At the population level, we show that a probabilistic sample augmented by an LLM provides a more accurate estimate of the aggregate preferences of a population than the non-augmented probabilistic sample alone. Together, these results indicate that policy preference data augmented using LLMs can capture nuances that transcend party lines and represents a promising avenue of research for data augmentation. This article is part of the theme issue 'Co-creating the future: participatory cities and digital governance'.

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering SciencesVol. 382(2285)
Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Harvard University (US), Corvinus University of Budapest (HU), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Université Toulouse-I-Capitole (FR), Manchester School of Architecture (GB), Toulouse School of Economics (FR), Institut de Recherche en Informatique de Toulouse (FR), Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès (FR), Institut Polytechnique de Bordeaux (FR)
European Commission, Agence Nationale de la Recherche, HORIZON EUROPE Climate, Energy and Mobility
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Media and Politics
10.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.