Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the fixed plumb line for postural and scoliosis assessment in the sagittal plane: a pilot study

FPL provided an ICC coefficient >0.90 for all the measures, while PL an average of 0.70. On AIS patients, PL and FPL showed a significant difference for C7 <i>p</i> < 0.001 and T12 <i>p</i> < 0.001. The measured parameters were sensitive to gender and age for the FPL, furthermore, the C7 and L3 measurements were statistically different between PL and FPL (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Intra-rater reliability results for FPL ranged from 0.94 to 0.98 across various parameters, while the SEM and MDC values underscore the valuable precision of the FPL with changes exceeding 1 cm being meaningful. These findings suggest that FPL could be a reliable and accurate tool for measuring sagittal distances of the spine in both scoliotic and non-scoliotic patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18121
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the fixed plumb line for postural and scoliosis assessment in the sagittal plane: a pilot study

M Zanghì, Claudia Lombardo, Giuseppe Musumeci, Carla Loreto et al.
5 citations
PeerJ
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
2.86
article

Intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the fixed plumb line for postural and scoliosis assessment in the sagittal plane: a pilot study

M Zanghì, Claudia Lombardo, Giuseppe Musumeci, Carla Loreto, Federico Roggio, Martina Sortino, Claudia Guglielmino, Bruno Trovato, Piero Pavone, Claudio Di Brigida
article en
5 citations

Abstract

FPL provided an ICC coefficient >0.90 for all the measures, while PL an average of 0.70. On AIS patients, PL and FPL showed a significant difference for C7 <i>p</i> < 0.001 and T12 <i>p</i> < 0.001. The measured parameters were sensitive to gender and age for the FPL, furthermore, the C7 and L3 measurements were statistically different between PL and FPL (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Intra-rater reliability results for FPL ranged from 0.94 to 0.98 across various parameters, while the SEM and MDC values underscore the valuable precision of the FPL with changes exceeding 1 cm being meaningful. These findings suggest that FPL could be a reliable and accurate tool for measuring sagittal distances of the spine in both scoliotic and non-scoliotic patients.

PeerJVol. 12
University of Catania (IT), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - San Marco" (IT), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES), Universidad de Murcia (ES), Temple University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Scoliosis diagnosis and treatment
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.